<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>EVGA shows its GTX 580 Classified again </title>
		<description>Discuss EVGA shows its GTX 580 Classified again </description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:54:37 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23763/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Zone says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29446</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well like I mentioned, you might as well step up to an GTX590 or HD6990 then. + do you think anyone who is in the market for this card does not have the money for watercooling?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Zone</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 07:42:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29446</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29267</link>
			<description><![CDATA[not having to have an expensive, maintained liquid cooling system.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:32:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29267</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Countess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29266</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@bro_fist you mean barely inching it out while using much more power and being far more expensive?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Countess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:29:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29266</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bro_fist says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29264</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Could be true... MSI GTX580 Lightning Xtreme Edition GIGABYTE GTX580 Super Overclock ASUS Matrix, Mars II All these cards raping AMD. Maybe EVGA wants to finish AMD off? :lol:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bro_fist</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:17:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29264</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Zone says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29233</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Man this site seems to be the place to be for cheap weak trolling. Anyway, I dont see the point of this card honestly, Watercooled cards can probably be faster and this card will not be as fast as an GTX590 or HD6990 sooooo.... whats the point of it?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Zone</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:58:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29233</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Squall_Rinoa89 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29207</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ROFL.. someone speaking out of his blow hole again??? Damn... This card will be a beast.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Squall_Rinoa89</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:07:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29207</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29195</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That POS will burn Nvidia fanboy's houses down!! Which can't be a bad thing. When will that company learn from its failures? Not until Huang goes.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:52:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29195</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The blue fox says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29190</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Centrifugal fan's are actually better at moving air. And is why they are used in servers, Central air systems. And video cards both from AMD and Nvidia.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The blue fox</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:39:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29190</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29187</link>
			<description><![CDATA[EVGA made this card dumbass, nvidia just provided the worlds fastest gpu!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:18:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29187</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MrScary says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29186</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Complete fail from nvidia again,a blower fan...wowwwww nice cooling device, yeah, will probably climb 101ºC and more. Nice product from a company that sells toys for enthusiast fanboys (read this like noob fanboys who like to be riped off).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MrScary</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:07:38 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23763-evga-shows-its-gtx-580-classified-again#comment-29186</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
