<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>No stock cooler with Sandy Bridge-E</title>
		<description>Discuss No stock cooler with Sandy Bridge-E</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:07:11 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23733/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>PorscheRacer14 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29119</link>
			<description><![CDATA[They don't normally test at that res. They had to lower it since the 590 can't always supply the framerates. Fine. But at native resolution the 590 falls on its face just like your and the other morons flaming on this bandwagon. In fact, a few of you sure have tell like Warrior so that's even more stupid running multiple accounts. I could care a less for these cards. A 6970 fits my budget nicely. NVIDIA does some good stuff, but they came out holding punches and since the latest drivers, aren't looking so good with the 590. I wonder how many are still working at this point? A believe a blown 590 gets like, what? 0 fps?? But hey you stick to that none native resolution with no AA to back you up. Read the charts above it and the conclusion. Even the 570 SLI looks much better than 590.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>PorscheRacer14</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:48:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29119</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>username says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29118</link>
			<description><![CDATA[so then why did you provide a link to a site that test "apples to apples" both cards at 5040X1050 if it wasn't "good enough"???!!! you look pretty stupid, im not gonna lie!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>username</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:22:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29118</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29117</link>
			<description><![CDATA[YOU are the one that posted the hardocp link to prove your point...and they tested at 5040x1050!!! and now that you look stupid, you claim 5040x1050 isn't good enough??!! ahahahahahahaha . some of your posts are decent so i honestly feel sorry for you!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:10:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29117</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29116</link>
			<description><![CDATA[you once again proved NOTHING! good job. 5040x1050 or any res...it doesn't matter ...apples to apples the 590 at a very high ( 5040x1050 ) res, did very well (matched or beat the 6990), YOU are an uneducated, unintelligent troll for amd... take your own advise man!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:07:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29116</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PorscheRacer14 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29114</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So you buy a $700 graphics card, with your expensive CPU, to match it up with three 17" monitors? 1680x1050 is low and sorry, not good enough. In apples to apples they had to drop resolution for the 590. Even then, 570 SLI looks better more times than the 590. If it struggles with high textures because it lacks performance and frame buffer, you won't be playing modern games in 3D Surround. And this is if the card doesn't join the graveyard like a bunch have over the months. It really shows how bad this site is with trolls and idiots. I can't even discuss SandyBridge without nVidia fans getting their flaming pink scarves in a knot.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>PorscheRacer14</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:57:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29114</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sevenstrung says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29112</link>
			<description><![CDATA["We truly thought the GTX 590 was going to make the Radeon 6990 look bad, but the fact of the matter is that NVIDIA made the 6990 look that much better. The GTX 590 is not the "World's Fastest Single Card Solution" as stated on our page 1 slides; the Radeon HD 6990 is very much retaining that title. Hail to the King, baby!" 1. they obviously know nvidia is better, as they admittedly expected them to win 2. hail to the king, baby. obviously shows this site's bias towards AMD 3. in a bias study NVIDIA still matches the competition! while providing more features 4. fanboy's are pathetic people..especially when they are wrong.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>sevenstrung</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:39:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29112</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29111</link>
			<description><![CDATA[dude, you are out of your element obviously....you cant even read your OWN links! the 590 trades blows and offers more to the customer( lower temps, 3D vision, etc etc.) the numbers I posted were at 5040X1050!!! i was going to go further in my defense, but it is an OBVIOUS waste of time...you sir are an idiot...READ YOUR OWN POSTS!!!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:27:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29111</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29110</link>
			<description><![CDATA[.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:21:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29110</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>sevenstrung says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29109</link>
			<description><![CDATA[what he posted was the very review you posted in their "apples to apples" if you dont know what that means...i will explain... 4xaa vs 4xaa...high quality vs high quality..seems simple enough to me.... competition at 5040X1050...are you retarded? is 5040X1050 not good enough for you? it is a close battle.. and if you cant see that then you are just as much a troll as the rest of them.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>sevenstrung</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 04:10:55 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29109</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PorscheRacer14 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29108</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We truly thought the GTX 590 was going to make the Radeon 6990 look bad, but the fact of the matter is that NVIDIA made the 6990 look that much better. The GTX 590 is not the "World's Fastest Single Card Solution" as stated on our page 1 slides; the Radeon HD 6990 is very much retaining that title. Hail to the King, baby! You stupid trolls. Can none of you read an entire article, or do you just look for something to twist to your liking? Those numbers you posted above have the cards running at lower resolution. Up the resolution and the 590 can't keep up. What is wrong with people? Reading comprehension has failed on your part and everyone else that patted each other on the ass with the thumbs up. Read... And then read it again. Lazy people...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>PorscheRacer14</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 03:52:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23733-no-stock-cooler-with-sandy-bridge-e#comment-29108</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
