<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>28nm Radeons this year</title>
		<description>Discuss 28nm Radeons this year</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:13:35 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23714/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>bro_fist says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29144</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You can't imagine something new so you ripping off my comments. :zzz evolucion - ejeculation. We have pussy here. :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bro_fist</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:18:43 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29144</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>evolucion8 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29094</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No, Im ejoying having an orgie with your mom and sister while Im fisting your hole with a GTX 590 Watercooled!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>evolucion8</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:07:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29094</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bro_fist says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29091</link>
			<description><![CDATA[evolucion8 you failed with your fried Kyle Bennett. You are gays enjoying your gay orgies with hot, slow Radeon dildos. :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bro_fist</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 20:13:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29091</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29086</link>
			<description><![CDATA[you aren't making any sense... he quoted the article and they called it the 590 3gb, not him...your stupid.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:58:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29086</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>evolucion8 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29085</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I posted links proved you wrong, Bit-tech and you are pathettic, saying that the 3GB version improved the performance a lot, you are a joke! All the GTX 590 are 3GB, 1.5GB per GPU, can't you get any dumber? Fanatic of a GPU which you don't even know well, JOKE! get a grip jerk!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>evolucion8</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:29:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29085</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>username says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29083</link>
			<description><![CDATA[so what is your point? the 590 beats the 6990 with one GB less ram??!!! YOUR A JOKE!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>username</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:12:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29083</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>evolucion8 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29082</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Username, you are a pathettic joke. AFAIK, all the GTX 590 are 3GB versions, which means 1.5x2=3GB. I haven't seen a 6GB version, you are a joke, in Bittech's link, it state the obvious. "With board space at a premium, the card’s 3GB of GDDR5 memory has been split between both sides of the PCB, with six 128MB modules arranged around each GPU, and another six fitted to the reverse, making a total of 24 modules (3,072MB). To cool the memory on the card’s backside, Nvidia has fitted the GTX 590 3GB with two small aluminium backplates. These carry a ‘warning – hot’ label, as they lack active cooling." See? 1.5GB per GPU. Even worse that Bittech used 1920x1080 and 2560x1600 resolutions to test these cards, a single GTX 580 is enough for that, these cards shines in Eyefinity/Surround mode, JOKE!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>evolucion8</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:03:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29082</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>username says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29081</link>
			<description><![CDATA[haha, this is the conclusion from bit-tech's site... " The GTX 590 3GB is definitely of the former persuasion, topping our performance charts in almost every test, no matter what resolution or game we used. In some games the lead over even AMD’s massive Radeon HD 6990 4GB was substantial and in others only marginal, but the GTX 590 3GB is the king of the graphics cards based on the performance we saw."]]></description>
			<dc:creator>username</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:36:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29081</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>evolucion8 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29079</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bro_gay, I love your Mars II card, can't wait to hold one soon!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>evolucion8</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:06:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23714-28nm-radeons-this-year#comment-29079</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
