<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel wants $20 for Atom chipset</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel wants $20 for Atom chipset</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23713-intel-wants-$20-for-atom-chipset</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:50:57 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23713/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>johndgr says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23713-intel-wants-$20-for-atom-chipset#comment-28846</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I don't think so. Android is hot right now so the companies are just selling high because they know they can sell high. There are companies that have little or nothing to do with Intel. They are selling mostly or only Android products and they would love to see Intel and X86 going down. Intel can not convince them to sell high or threaten them or bribe them. This article is just another "I love Nvidia and I hate Intel". Fuad sometimes reminds me of Charlie from Semiaccurate.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>johndgr</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 10:06:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23713-intel-wants-$20-for-atom-chipset#comment-28846</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pogsnet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23713-intel-wants-$20-for-atom-chipset#comment-28841</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@johndgr Maybe Intel is involve why this ARM based tablets are still expensive. If you recall history they are much capable of doing control of other market than their own product. The rest imagine it...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pogsnet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 05:21:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23713-intel-wants-$20-for-atom-chipset#comment-28841</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>redisnidma says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23713-intel-wants-$20-for-atom-chipset#comment-28813</link>
			<description><![CDATA[$20 dollars of crap, that's all you getting for. You have to be insane to drop into this whoever you are.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>redisnidma</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:35:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23713-intel-wants-$20-for-atom-chipset#comment-28813</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23713-intel-wants-$20-for-atom-chipset#comment-28810</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yet somehow Atom powered devices are far cheaper than ARM powered devices...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:53:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23713-intel-wants-$20-for-atom-chipset#comment-28810</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>johndgr says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23713-intel-wants-$20-for-atom-chipset#comment-28782</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Little good cheap ARM. 3 times more for bad Intel. So... $20 for Tegra+something and the tablet costs $500. $95 for Intel solution and the tablet costs $1500? Right? No? No, Intel tablet costs almost the same. So, stop blaming Intel (I am an AMD fan anyway) and start blaming the expensive ARM based solutions, considering that they use a $20 chip and a much cheaper, than windows, OS.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>johndgr</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:25:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23713-intel-wants-$20-for-atom-chipset#comment-28782</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
