<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>First Sandy Bridge-E models detailed</title>
		<description>Discuss First Sandy Bridge-E models detailed</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23474-first-sandy-bridge-e-models-detailed</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:41:47 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23474/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23474-first-sandy-bridge-e-models-detailed#comment-27206</link>
			<description><![CDATA[understood.agreed.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:24:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23474-first-sandy-bridge-e-models-detailed#comment-27206</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Skynet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23474-first-sandy-bridge-e-models-detailed#comment-27204</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ bardenck I just feel that the high end should be cutting edge, after all you are paying a massive premium for it. But the way that Intel has done its high end this time just seems cheap. They should have released Sandy Bridge high end first so that the massive premium that you pay for owning the high end was worth it. I just can't see these chips being that much better than regular SB, not clock for clock, core for core. time will tell i guess and i am not saying they won't be fast but i think with great chips like 2500k and possibly bulldozer too then SB-e is going to struggle to delivery bang per buck like the 1366 i7 920 did.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Skynet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:18:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23474-first-sandy-bridge-e-models-detailed#comment-27204</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23474-first-sandy-bridge-e-models-detailed#comment-27196</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i agree so far about the 3820 but SB is old?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:18:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23474-first-sandy-bridge-e-models-detailed#comment-27196</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Skynet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23474-first-sandy-bridge-e-models-detailed#comment-27187</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What a massive let down! Sandy Bridge's arch is old now so if Intel want people to get excited and spend big bucks on old tech then it needs to be special, and hex-core is not that! All the SB-E should have all been 8-core and just differentiated by speeds and cache sizes. The i7-3820 is a joke! How is a locked quad core at 3.9GHz max going to beat the 2500k/2600k that are far far cheaper and can be clocked closer to 5GHz? Quad-memory won't do sh1t and 10mb cache will only help a little in certain applications. Intel have really messed up this round IMO. SB-E should have been out before SB, only then do you bring out the cheaper models. I just wish i bought the 2500k on launch day!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Skynet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:34:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23474-first-sandy-bridge-e-models-detailed#comment-27187</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>milkod2001 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23474-first-sandy-bridge-e-models-detailed#comment-27178</link>
			<description><![CDATA[the chepeast one should go under 400 bucks,that's not bad at all.Question is:how much mobo will cost and would it be that much better than 2600k?And it comes next year,same as IvyBridge CPUs, is there a point to release Sandy Bridge-E at all?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>milkod2001</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:05:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23474-first-sandy-bridge-e-models-detailed#comment-27178</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cartman says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23474-first-sandy-bridge-e-models-detailed#comment-27177</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And they will cost two arms as always with Intel EE :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Cartman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:01:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23474-first-sandy-bridge-e-models-detailed#comment-27177</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>maroon1 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23474-first-sandy-bridge-e-models-detailed#comment-27175</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Actually, Core i7-3820 is going to have partially unlocked multi It is going to have 6 bins above the highest Turbo]]></description>
			<dc:creator>maroon1</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:44:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23474-first-sandy-bridge-e-models-detailed#comment-27175</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
