<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>OMAP 5 28nm supports Windows 8</title>
		<description>Discuss OMAP 5 28nm supports Windows 8</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23462-omap-5-28nm-supports-windows-8</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:50:40 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23462/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>dan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23462-omap-5-28nm-supports-windows-8#comment-27162</link>
			<description><![CDATA[OMAP is a SoC, not a CPU.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:41:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23462-omap-5-28nm-supports-windows-8#comment-27162</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>guideX says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23462-omap-5-28nm-supports-windows-8#comment-27130</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Its not hard to know that Krait, OMAP5, A6 will all beat Nvidia's 28nm offering. I mean Tegra comes last in dual core performance even today, and that's when they have 40nm whilst everyone else is @ 45nm.. Tegra's chance is in this quad core "Kal-EL" chip coming at the end of the year, i hope they can get it running without it being the company's official successor to FERMI.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>guideX</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:32:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23462-omap-5-28nm-supports-windows-8#comment-27130</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
