<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Adobe Flash Player 11 beta comes out</title>
		<description>Discuss Adobe Flash Player 11 beta comes out</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23451-adobe-flash-player-11-beta-comes-out</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:13:53 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23451/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Squall_Leonhart says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23451-adobe-flash-player-11-beta-comes-out#comment-27150</link>
			<description><![CDATA[don't even bother with this build, they broke filtered scaling.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Squall_Leonhart</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 01:21:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23451-adobe-flash-player-11-beta-comes-out#comment-27150</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>fed44 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23451-adobe-flash-player-11-beta-comes-out#comment-27148</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well first of all the speed of the javascript engine is pretty much irrelevant for flash and even if it was if you just play with some of the ie test drive speed demos you will notice that generally the hardware acceleration is more interesting than the speed of the javascript. Take http://disneydigitalbooks.go.com/tron/ as an example, it will deliver a superb experience even on a 64bit browser.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>fed44</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 11:45:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23451-adobe-flash-player-11-beta-comes-out#comment-27148</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Exodite says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23451-adobe-flash-player-11-beta-comes-out#comment-27142</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Now we, or at least I, only need a 64-bit version of Chrome for Windows to take advantage.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Exodite</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 04:36:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23451-adobe-flash-player-11-beta-comes-out#comment-27142</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>redunion1940 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23451-adobe-flash-player-11-beta-comes-out#comment-27128</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Cool, even though they did have a 64bit version of 10x for IE9 64bit, I wouldn't recommend it, because microsoft in there wisdom decided not to implement there chakra engine in ie9 64bit.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>redunion1940</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:58:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23451-adobe-flash-player-11-beta-comes-out#comment-27128</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
