<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel confirms flaw in 320-series SSDs</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel confirms flaw in 320-series SSDs</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23447-intel-confirms-flaw-in-320-series-ssds</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:46:21 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23447/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>nemo9fish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23447-intel-confirms-flaw-in-320-series-ssds#comment-27100</link>
			<description><![CDATA[a few typos there..]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nemo9fish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:47:23 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23447-intel-confirms-flaw-in-320-series-ssds#comment-27100</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23447-intel-confirms-flaw-in-320-series-ssds#comment-27082</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If it's capacity recognition then it may be firmware related, easy fixed providing that the drives aren't stuck that way]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:20:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23447-intel-confirms-flaw-in-320-series-ssds#comment-27082</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
