<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Netbooks, tablets and Notebook's history </title>
		<description>Discuss Netbooks, tablets and Notebook's history </description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23437-netbooks-tablets-and-notebooks-history</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:13:33 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23437/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>roberto.tomas says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23437-netbooks-tablets-and-notebooks-history#comment-27163</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think that claim implies that graphics cards' power requirements are going to drop considerably in the next ten years. if things continued as they are now, but only get a linear decrease in power consumption (to die size) -- you'd get a split between light-weight, tablet sized (or maybe 21:9 keyboard-sized touch screen) "ultra-portables", and full-sized "gaming laptops" / "workstations" sporting powerful discreet graphics.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>roberto.tomas</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:48:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23437-netbooks-tablets-and-notebooks-history#comment-27163</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>STRESS says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23437-netbooks-tablets-and-notebooks-history#comment-27022</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Tablets have a lifetime that is probably not half as long as dead. Since there still is no use-case for them]]></description>
			<dc:creator>STRESS</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:44:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23437-netbooks-tablets-and-notebooks-history#comment-27022</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
