<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Eight core Bulldozer overclocked to 4.63GHz</title>
		<description>Discuss Eight core Bulldozer overclocked to 4.63GHz</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:35:19 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23210/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>muziqaz says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25924</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Are you kidding or are you serious? :D You do know, that nvidia avoids using all the SSE optimisations just because without them CPU looks so weak compared to GPUs in physics calculations :) Besides nVidia develops their physics stuff specifically for their GPUs, nothing else ;)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>muziqaz</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:29:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25924</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>themassau says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25923</link>
			<description><![CDATA[the example is nvidias phisicsx :p]]></description>
			<dc:creator>themassau</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:50:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25923</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Karandar says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25904</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Can CPU-Z 1.57 even ID a bulldozer core guys? I know 1.58 can by the release notes, but there is no mention in the 1.57's...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Karandar</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:32:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25904</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jedm33 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25854</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Newer SIMD's is faster and more efficient than x87, that's why it was replaced by SSE2, and besides it's only a legacy feature of todays cpu which minimally occupies 5% of the die itself.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jedm33</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:47:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25854</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nt300 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25853</link>
			<description><![CDATA[With Bulldozer coming out soon, why on earth would anybody buy a CPU today? Once Bulldozer gets released, there should be some super strong competition that should help drive prices down............]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nt300</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 02:29:13 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25853</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nt300 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25852</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Stock Cooling was used. Most if not all AMD samples they've shown in the past had stock cooling from what I remember...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nt300</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 02:27:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25852</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>muziqaz says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25850</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I can see from the 1st word, that you are some kid fanboy running super pi all day, aren't you? Maybe you could give me an example of the todays application which uses x87? Super Pi is useful just to see how fast CPU runs Super Pi app, nothing else, just super pi program.Idiot]]></description>
			<dc:creator>muziqaz</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 02:00:13 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25850</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Squall_Leonhart says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25849</link>
			<description><![CDATA[idiot, the performance of x87 is important. if ancient FPU performance is slow then this is a sign the raw performance of the cpu will be nothing to look twice at.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Squall_Leonhart</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:43:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25849</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25840</link>
			<description><![CDATA[2600k :P]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:22:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25840</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Boomstick777 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25837</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes, you should of got a 2500K :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Boomstick777</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:47:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23210-eight-core-bulldozer-overclocked-to-463ghz#comment-25837</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
