<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD won’t endorse SYSmark 2012</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD won’t endorse SYSmark 2012</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:54:46 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23153/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Nonameman says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25541</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Easy there buddy, don't blow your load all over your intel fanboism shirt. Learn English then you can post, oh and grow some facial hair TROLL!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nonameman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:40:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25541</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MrScary says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25405</link>
			<description><![CDATA[VIA,nvidia and shiny AMD left that shit behind, sys is for monopoly companies, who likes to pay for great scores, and [censored] their rivals.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MrScary</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:39:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25405</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MrScary says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25404</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If u have no idea about what u are saying better not act like a clairvoyant, u dont know nothing, u are only the Troll scrayer, nothing else.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MrScary</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:37:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25404</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MrScary says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25403</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Of course not, they are almost as biased on giving a true review as anandtech, they are totally paid by intel, wich by the way is the only company left to endorse [censored]ing sysmark, nvidia made the only right desicion on his entire life and also left... But fuworld isn´t going to tell u that, they only sell intel proganda and half truth reports, on behalf his master, intel. Not only they put on their knees but also the lick its boots.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MrScary</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:34:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25403</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>darkpulse says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25377</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Jigar +1! I dont really think Fud is UNBIASED. Leaving that topic aside, i think its a good move by AMD. Of course users want real-world benchmarks and that is all that matters. Who cares about synthetic or biased benchmarks?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>darkpulse</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:43:24 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25377</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>fuadzilla says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25372</link>
			<description><![CDATA[vote for openness. vote amd. cheers.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>fuadzilla</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:21:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25372</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Drac says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25370</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Why then you visiting this site if you accusing they staff of lying? Oh,i guess i know - typical trolling :D Cant wait dan-fagtroll "comment" on this matter LOL Truth is,amd have problems with they cpus,and thats fact,they delayed bobdozzer already 4 times,that says something about they performance,so nothing strange amd not happy. But why somebody should care about it,amd not main cpu provider,fact.Only amd fagboys who trolling here will buy much slower,old tech cpus and will troll that they "very guuud" LOL amd PWND by Intel to easily :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Drac</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:17:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25370</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25364</link>
			<description><![CDATA[:-|]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:51:55 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25364</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hanoking says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25359</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Article forgets to mention that AMD + Nvidia + VIA dumped Bapco and not only AMD. This leaves only Intel alone, what a coincidence, now people should buy Intel with confidence.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hanoking</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:35:50 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25359</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>agent_47 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25355</link>
			<description><![CDATA[eemmm, y did you not link the source? is it coz AMD logically explained their reason for its choice and managed to make arguments? i mean, you did not even any give technical details of y AMD denounced it. anyways, here is a cource: http://blogs.amd.com/nigel-dessau/2011/06/21/1006/ also nvidia also left it...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>agent_47</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:10:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23153-amd-won’t-endorse-sysmark-2012#comment-25355</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
