<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel commits Cedar View for 5 year support</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel commits Cedar View for 5 year support</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23122-intel-commits-cedar-view-for-5-year-support</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:47:31 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23122/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Marburg_U says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23122-intel-commits-cedar-view-for-5-year-support#comment-25216</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No, what you quoted is exactly right. Take AMD embedded E2400, born in 2008 - it will be sold at least till 2013; precisely because this is what embedded manufacturers want: being able to get materials for their platforms form many years.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Marburg_U</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:08:13 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23122-intel-commits-cedar-view-for-5-year-support#comment-25216</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>chyll2 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23122-intel-commits-cedar-view-for-5-year-support#comment-25196</link>
			<description><![CDATA[nope. this is what Intel wants so they can create Atom based products with different names but they more or less perform the same. thank's to Nvidia and AMD (ATI) effort, what Intel deemed unnecessary are available in the market (e.g. very light gaming, hardware acceleration for media and flash)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>chyll2</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:57:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23122-intel-commits-cedar-view-for-5-year-support#comment-25196</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
