<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Kal El has same or better battery</title>
		<description>Discuss Kal El has same or better battery</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23088-kal-el-has-same-or-better-battery</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:34:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23088/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>p3ngwin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23088-kal-el-has-same-or-better-battery#comment-25034</link>
			<description><![CDATA[tegra 2 is 1Ghz, so let's not make too many comparisons with a 1.5Ghz clock speed and battery life for dual and quadcores. also, as pointed out, the manufacturing process and the graphics core are different too, so comparisons are even more apples-to-oranges.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>p3ngwin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:16:50 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23088-kal-el-has-same-or-better-battery#comment-25034</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>agent_47 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23088-kal-el-has-same-or-better-battery#comment-25005</link>
			<description><![CDATA[n article without a source by urs truely fuad suckin up to nvidia..... y m i not surprised]]></description>
			<dc:creator>agent_47</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:32:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23088-kal-el-has-same-or-better-battery#comment-25005</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>roberto.tomas says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23088-kal-el-has-same-or-better-battery#comment-24965</link>
			<description><![CDATA[hmm, not sure if serious. Kal El (Tegra 3) should have the same power management as Tegra 2, except for the GPU — they are both ARM Cortex A9 MP-core CPUs. Another neat thing to notice, if they actually verified that the successor to Kal El will be 28nm, they as good as confirmed that it will be their first cortex a15, and that it will make 2012 timeline, not ARM's more conservative 2013. Where'd you get that stat?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>roberto.tomas</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:49:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23088-kal-el-has-same-or-better-battery#comment-24965</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23088-kal-el-has-same-or-better-battery#comment-24953</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Same IDLE battery life, maybe. But not same battery life when it's actually USING those 4 ARM cores and more shaders. (Nvidia's shaders are well reknowned for being power-hungry).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:43:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23088-kal-el-has-same-or-better-battery#comment-24953</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
