<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Latest 360 slims feature SoC</title>
		<description>Discuss Latest 360 slims feature SoC</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:02:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23036/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24675</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Boomstick777 LOL, my apologies for your name, that was a genuine Freudian slip!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:28:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24675</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>techno says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24662</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Like someone else said cpu + gpu have been on the same chip for some time......I though SOC meant system on a chip and that they have also included the memory on the die or in the package?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>techno</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:11:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24662</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24652</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow. I know this site is late sometimes, but a whole year? What the hell?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:54:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24652</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Boomstick777 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24628</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@loadspit Thanks for that, yeah it is indeed a new design with a refreshed motherboard aswell .. http://www.t3.com/news/xbox-360-given-processor-update-by-microsoft?=57481]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Boomstick777</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:13:23 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24628</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Harry Lloyd says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24608</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Now that's what we call progress - introducing latency and throttling.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Harry Lloyd</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:10:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24608</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24603</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This has been known for months? WAKE UP DAVID and quote some sources for once.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:44:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24603</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FlOw says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24599</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I Already am one :P]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FlOw</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:15:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24599</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kryojenix says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24597</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sounds like you want to be a PC gamer, Friend. ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kryojenix</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:08:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24597</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FlOw says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24596</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Indeed, they could easily make the 360 much faster but that might break compatibility and bla bla. I hope the next gen consoles will be designed to allow increased clockspeeds as yields improve. Seems like a waste having chips capable of doing 4.2ghz and gimping them to 3.2(random guess but plausible)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FlOw</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:47:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24596</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24591</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Broomstick, Not 100% on this but unless Fudzilla are years behind the times i am guessing they are trying to say that the CPU and GPU are being intergrated into a single die, hence the Fusion / Sandy Bridge comparision. The earlier SoC versions were just 2 seperate dies on a single chip. Its a shame they have to 'throttle' the performance as some games still go down to 5fps at times which could be elliminated.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:02:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23036-latest-360-slims-feature-soc#comment-24591</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
