<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Samsung releases 30nm DDR3</title>
		<description>Discuss Samsung releases 30nm DDR3</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:07:55 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23034/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>romulous says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24709</link>
			<description><![CDATA[1.6Gpbs is the speed of one chip. This is not talking about DIMMS ! The title says dram module, as these are used on different products.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>romulous</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:12:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24709</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24571</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That's the transfer speed of the interface, it doesn't mean USB drives will be reading and writing at 5Gb/s]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:41:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24571</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>roberto.tomas says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24570</link>
			<description><![CDATA[this is really a weird read. NAND and memory are usually the first products at a die size. For example, intel is already at 20nm on ssds — that's not production, that's what's on the shelves at stores around the world already. Intel is not the leading manufacturer for ram, taiwan (which isnt samsung but) companies are a full node ahead of intel. They are probably struggling with 8nm shrink in sampling right now. further, 1.6Gbps data rate is awesomely slow for ram. USB is now faster than this.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>roberto.tomas</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:31:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24570</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Twist3d1080 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24555</link>
			<description><![CDATA[From the article: "They are backwards compatible with systems designed for previous DDR3 and DDR2 memory and available in single or dual-pack quantities." Wait what? I haven't heard this before and I hate to sound like a newb. Does this mean i could throw these things in my DDR2 Mobo and it would work?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Twist3d1080</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 17:56:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24555</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24553</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes i realise that but RAM still suffers from errors hence why you can buy ECC RAM. I was asking if this error rate is increased as they shrink the manufacturing process, as the case is with NAND chips.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:57:50 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24553</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Shadow187 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24552</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Small play on words...now find how much more energy efficient 40nm is to 60nm and factor that in.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Shadow187</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:08:23 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24552</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24542</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Must be the solar flares messing up people's minds... :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:24:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24542</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24532</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@loadwick - this is DRAM for DIMMs, ie RAM, not flash for persistent storage. ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:35:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24532</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jurassic1024 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24530</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The new modules transfer data at up to 1,600 Mbps, 20 percent faster than Samsung’s current 40nm-class generation of DDR3 DRAM.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jurassic1024</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:10:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24530</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eugen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24522</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ignore my post..]]></description>
			<dc:creator>eugen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:23:24 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23034-samsung-releases-30nm-ddr3#comment-24522</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
