<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD officially confirms Bulldozer delay</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD officially confirms Bulldozer delay</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:09:40 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22942/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>themassau says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23998</link>
			<description><![CDATA[zambabi wont have a gpu only tryneti will have one but can't amd sell the failed 8 core server parts for if there are stil 6 cores working se we could use it on the desktop.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>themassau</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 13:26:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23998</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thomasg says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23971</link>
			<description><![CDATA[9-series mobos are already out!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thomasg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 05:45:38 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23971</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nt300 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23969</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bulldozer is not delayed. They flipped the release dates with the Server pards. Now we are going to see the Server pards released before Desktop parts. Also no performance issues, so they should have no problem Bulldozing to the TOP... LINK: http://semiaccurate.com/2011/06/02/bulldozer-delayed-and-not-delayed/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nt300</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 02:24:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23969</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>cantsee19 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23962</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Are you okay, sir?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>cantsee19</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:06:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23962</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ramcoza says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23957</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Expected advantages over competitive products Sandy Bridge 1. Lower TDP 2. Higher core performance??? (Not known though expected) Zambezi 1. Higher GPU power 2. Higher performance in multitasking/ multi-thread applications??? (Not known though expected)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ramcoza</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:38:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23957</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ramcoza says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23956</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My personal opinion.. If FX-8130P's CPU power < i7 2600K's GPU > i7 2600K's Both Intel and AMD will be happy if FX-8130P's CPU = i7 2600K's GPU > i7 2600K's Still both Intel and AMD will be happy. # of AMD fans will increase a bit. if FX-8130P's CPU power > i7 2600K's GPU power > i7 2600K's AMD is happy, Intel in trouble. if FX-8130P's CPU = i7 2500K's GPU > i7 2700K's (AMD in trouble. i7 2500K + $50-$75 GPU will cost less than FX-8130P.. Even with $100 GPU, it will cost as much as FX8130P)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ramcoza</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:37:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23956</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>razorleaf says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23908</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If this new buldozer module architecture is not going to affect it's OC capabilitys, it is going to be good. Intel will not make any GPU that can take it ( at least for now ), so all 3Dmark is where AMD is going to rock. New... FX? Edit: Yes I do like AMD, cause they allways make power efficent CPU's for home usage. Mdfkr#$% :roll: :-*]]></description>
			<dc:creator>razorleaf</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:10:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23908</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>genetix says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23902</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So, they arrive several times too late. AMD adds when they have said to be released even while new 990FX/950SB is now on the door way an delay to get an CPU to the box and expects us to pay MORE money on their new product with some cheesy threaded crap. heh, looks to me that we will be staying on Intel Corp products unless they are gonna step up hit 6-8 modules to a CPU and then sell it cheap. Competition to 2600K? heh, like the 2600K wouldn't be bad enough. I mean the P55 lineup is a sad cheap crap compared to something like X38/X58 systems and to top that out we have Dual-channel memory controllers and only good thing offered is to server market.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>genetix</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:12:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23902</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>razorleaf says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23901</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So it has 4,2ghz turbo core 8 treads, new architecture on 32nm proces, what else you want to troll??]]></description>
			<dc:creator>razorleaf</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:04:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23901</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Drac says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23868</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And only desperate amd fanboys can hope that this piece of delayed crap will beat Intels offerings - dozzer late nearly 1year,have nothing but problems,thats why it was delayed 3 or 4 times now,its an IT joke now LOL I cant stop laughing at you amd fanboys who trying make some fake stories just make feel better because they beloved amd sukced yet again. amd=EPIC FAIL,which company on earth will do such stupid edvert for they life saving product?answer - only amd LOL :D Now,lets troll amd n00bs,your beloved amd sucked Intel again MHUAHAHAHAHA :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Drac</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:58:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22942-amd-officially-confirms-bulldozer-delay#comment-23868</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
