<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Bulldozer pushed back for late July</title>
		<description>Discuss Bulldozer pushed back for late July</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:32:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22904/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>crackerz says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23790</link>
			<description><![CDATA[+1 (I can't agree more with you)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>crackerz</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:11:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23790</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>stoneeh says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23770</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Fail.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>stoneeh</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 23:32:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23770</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23723</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wrong on every level. AMD is in a terrible situation. The G34/32 parts bombed massively, they are not selling. The server market is most of AMD's margins. They don't make much if any profit from selling $100 and under consumer CPUs. If AMD had a slam dunk in Bulldozer, they wouldn't shut up about it. Intel was in a much better position in early 2006 than AMD is today. Night and day.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 12:58:23 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23723</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dave_Tangeir says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23711</link>
			<description><![CDATA[http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2011/5/30/amd-delays-bulldozer-citing-performance-issues.aspx If they are just now getting B2 into the fabs then late July is optimistic at best, more like mid to late September. I like how BSN describes the current state of bulldozer as "in one of our discussions with former AMD executive, we were told that B0 silicon was more akin to "Man with a Shovel" rather than being a "Bulldozer". "]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dave_Tangeir</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 09:32:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23711</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23710</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Obviously AMD is waiting for Duke Nukem ;-(]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 09:04:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23710</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ken Fused says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23706</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think I can deal with this. It's a LOT better than selling the bad chips and having to do damage control. (Can anyone say TLB bug?)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ken Fused</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 07:32:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23706</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>youserzero says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23701</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The mouse scared the elephant so badly that the elephant illegally paid many companies not to use the mouses chips. This got the elephant in legal hot water in many countries such as Australia, Japan, Korea and the USA.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>youserzero</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:15:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23701</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Countess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23700</link>
			<description><![CDATA[engineering sample server benchmarks are already out. and no AMD would NOT be be 'whoring' that thing because their current products are still selling. Intel did it with the core2 because all they had was the god awful p4 which wasn't selling at the time. nvidia did it with the gtx480 when all they had was the god awful gtx280. but those are exceptions. all it does it hurt sales of current products. so unless those aren't selling anyway its counter productive. so no, no benchmarks tell you exactly nothing.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Countess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 23:51:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23700</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Boomstick777 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23696</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think you misunderstand, those who want an upgrade soon may choose Sandybridge over Bulldozer simply becausce as you say 'Bulldozer is not out yet'.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Boomstick777</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 23:00:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23696</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23690</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Interesting how many have already spelled doom & gloom with Bulldozer despite the fact it's not out. Nobody knows how she's going to perform nor do we know how much it's going to cost. In my opinion, Bulldozer is going to do just that, Bulldoze the competition into a massive price war with everybody reaping the rewards... GO Bulldozer GO...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 21:58:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22904-bulldozer-pushed-back-for-late-july#comment-23690</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
