<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD Fusion strategy leaked</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD Fusion strategy leaked</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:14:11 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22892/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23608</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That's assuming that the power consumption ratio between the two remains constant, which is highly unlikely in a realistic situation. In some cases, the difference will be less than 30%, while in others it will be more. A bit less is probably more common, however.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 15:39:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23608</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23607</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dude, seriously, are you 5? Wait for it to show up and then wait a bit more for the prices to cool off.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 15:30:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23607</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BernardP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23605</link>
			<description><![CDATA[OK,OK. Fusion is/will be great :zzz ...but... Can we get Bulldozer now? :cry:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BernardP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 04:08:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23605</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Memristor says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23571</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So what, If both systems are tested with the same settings than AMD is still ahead of Intel by more than 30%.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Memristor</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 18:53:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23571</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23570</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's a thing people usually do, they leave the laptop on, kinda like a phone, because booting or wakening from sleep takes too long. In that state the screen is turned off for not being used and so on and so forth.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 18:53:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23570</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23556</link>
			<description><![CDATA[WTF is "resting?"]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 15:50:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23556</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23547</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's not an important figure but the slides say "up to 10h resting battery life", the footnote also says 8h+ in Windows idle.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 14:50:13 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23547</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nele says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23540</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Of course, it's usually a pointless best case scenario test - everything downclocked back to 1990s levels and the screen is dimmer than a dead lightbulb.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nele</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23540</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23539</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I really want to know the testing conditions of the battery life tests, as well as the specs. Otherwise, I have to take it as being heavily inflated (as with the vast majority of battery life estimates).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 13:53:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23539</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nele says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23538</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yeah, but it's still not confirmed by a third party. So far so good - too bad Llano was delayed by a couple of quarters, it could have really turned things around for AMD in the mobile segment... Oh well, better late than never]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nele</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 13:53:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22892-amd-fusion-strategy-leaked#comment-23538</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
