<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD E-350 vs Intel Atom D525+ION2</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD E-350 vs Intel Atom D525+ION2</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22841-amd-e350-e-350-intel-atom-d525-ion2</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:07:36 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22841/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>eliot says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22841-amd-e350-e-350-intel-atom-d525-ion2#comment-23586</link>
			<description><![CDATA[two week CPUs or CPU vs APU does not crash each other... While in WinRAR the difference is noticable (as a user) in any other application you won't notice. So there is no crushing involved. Crushing maybe a word to choose for the single-threaded performance which is still more important nowadays because most software besides games don't bother to utilize that potential. And something like Photoshop is a bit too much for such CPUs either. Even the x264 was just for the fun of it, not really to suggest to any user to do any encoding with it ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>eliot</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 00:18:50 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22841-amd-e350-e-350-intel-atom-d525-ion2#comment-23586</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eliot says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22841-amd-e350-e-350-intel-atom-d525-ion2#comment-23585</link>
			<description><![CDATA[LoL, in the last review I did not bother to include any games and many were outraged... So what is it what you want? If I do one game it's not ok, if I don't it's not ok either... make up your minds. ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>eliot</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 00:13:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22841-amd-e350-e-350-intel-atom-d525-ion2#comment-23585</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nele says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22841-amd-e350-e-350-intel-atom-d525-ion2#comment-23361</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well it depends really... I'm getting a Fusion HTPC soon and since I'm not into console gaming (or any sort of gaming for that matter), I'm planning to install a few "oldies". Of course, hardware won't be an issue for Worms or Angry Birds, but there's plenty of older games worth playing, for example some racing titles, fighting games, sports (mainly PES) - basically anything that can be fun with a couple of gamepads and a bunch of drunk people around... I don't need a console, I just want to run some old, simple and silly games when I feel like it. :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nele</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 12:38:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22841-amd-e350-e-350-intel-atom-d525-ion2#comment-23361</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The blue fox says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22841-amd-e350-e-350-intel-atom-d525-ion2#comment-23358</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I don't understand Gaming bench marks on hardware like this. No one ever going to play games Other then Warcraft on this kind of hardware.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The blue fox</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 12:11:23 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22841-amd-e350-e-350-intel-atom-d525-ion2#comment-23358</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wolfesteinabhi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22841-amd-e350-e-350-intel-atom-d525-ion2#comment-23357</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AND YEAH this site clearly needs a PROOF READER! .. i read the sentence on first page thrice to understand that it actually is saying "512KB of Cache" "The Atom D525 is clocked at 1.8GHz, has 2x 512MB 2nd Level Cache" LOL :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wolfesteinabhi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 12:03:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22841-amd-e350-e-350-intel-atom-d525-ion2#comment-23357</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bunker says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22841-amd-e350-e-350-intel-atom-d525-ion2#comment-23354</link>
			<description><![CDATA[excuse me? while i do like the benchmarks i don't like your conclusions AT ALL. good thing you've added your results... the E350 completely crushes both atoms in every benchmark other than dual threaded cinebench... And i LOL'd at your conclusions the old atom uses 4Watts less in far cry. Sure, thats what the graph says, but the E350 accually doubles the 330's framrates. how can you honestly take that benchmark as a standard. sigh... maybe you should also add an efficiency score for far cry. that should be fun to watch you justify intel/nvidiass poor results there]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bunker</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 11:52:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22841-amd-e350-e-350-intel-atom-d525-ion2#comment-23354</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
