<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Mobile Llano lineup revealed</title>
		<description>Discuss Mobile Llano lineup revealed</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22809-mobile-llano-lineup-revealed</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:07:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22809/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>JAB Creations says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22809-mobile-llano-lineup-revealed#comment-23232</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The A6-3400M looks like the sweet spot, lowest mobile quad watt usage and respectable graphics. Even in the face of the typical Intel bias with the E-350 being capable of playing games I think these parts will be more than enough for most. A laptop sporting a 35 watt quad and decent graphics would make for an affordable laptop for LAN parties. :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JAB Creations</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 19:42:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22809-mobile-llano-lineup-revealed#comment-23232</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AMD says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22809-mobile-llano-lineup-revealed#comment-23205</link>
			<description><![CDATA[They have different architectures, so I think you can't predict the clock speed of one based on the other. Llano at 1.6Ghz will be faster than bobcat at 1.6Ghz, I think.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AMD</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 16:37:13 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22809-mobile-llano-lineup-revealed#comment-23205</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AMD says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22809-mobile-llano-lineup-revealed#comment-23204</link>
			<description><![CDATA[They have different architectures, so I think you can't predict the clock speed of one based on the other.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>AMD</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 16:36:22 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22809-mobile-llano-lineup-revealed#comment-23204</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>agent_47 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22809-mobile-llano-lineup-revealed#comment-23168</link>
			<description><![CDATA[hmmm....i was expecting a lil more speed on the dual core given that a 1.6 E350 runs at 18W]]></description>
			<dc:creator>agent_47</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 11:52:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22809-mobile-llano-lineup-revealed#comment-23168</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
