<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nvidia introduces GT 545 and GT 530</title>
		<description>Discuss Nvidia introduces GT 545 and GT 530</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22786-nvidia-introduces-gt-545-and-gt-530</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 07:05:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22786/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>pogsnet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22786-nvidia-introduces-gt-545-and-gt-530#comment-23069</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Non sense memory sizes for low end cards =(]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pogsnet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 08:50:38 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22786-nvidia-introduces-gt-545-and-gt-530#comment-23069</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Shadow187 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22786-nvidia-introduces-gt-545-and-gt-530#comment-23046</link>
			<description><![CDATA[GT 530 2GB. I lol'd.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Shadow187</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 19:41:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22786-nvidia-introduces-gt-545-and-gt-530#comment-23046</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22786-nvidia-introduces-gt-545-and-gt-530#comment-23020</link>
			<description><![CDATA[your wasting your own time commenting, no one cares about what matters to you, maybe someone is interested in this card and wants to read about it jackass.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 14:33:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22786-nvidia-introduces-gt-545-and-gt-530#comment-23020</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>darkpulse says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22786-nvidia-introduces-gt-545-and-gt-530#comment-23006</link>
			<description><![CDATA[another waste of my time......]]></description>
			<dc:creator>darkpulse</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 13:16:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22786-nvidia-introduces-gt-545-and-gt-530#comment-23006</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BernardP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22786-nvidia-introduces-gt-545-and-gt-530#comment-22989</link>
			<description><![CDATA[GT 530 is probably a renamed GT 430/GT 440. As for the GT 545, it seems to be crippled versions of a larger chip, maybe GT 450.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BernardP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 12:06:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22786-nvidia-introduces-gt-545-and-gt-530#comment-22989</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
