<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>VIA shows off its first quad-core</title>
		<description>Discuss VIA shows off its first quad-core</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22717-via-shows-off-its-first-quad-core</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:46:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22717/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Medallish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22717-via-shows-off-its-first-quad-core#comment-22796</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well Nano x2 has never sold as well as Atom or Brazo's either, and looking on the market there seems to be quite a big amount of Phenom II mobiles atleast when compared to how AMD did in Laptops before. My laptop happens to have the 2.1GHz 34W Phenom II. I'm pretty sure Brazos is K8, Fuad's misleading article was about Llano, which he said would be K8, but we all know will be "Stars" core, so therefore based on K10+]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Medallish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 07:58:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22717-via-shows-off-its-first-quad-core#comment-22796</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pogsnet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22717-via-shows-off-its-first-quad-core#comment-22795</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Phenom II Quad Core never went to mass production compare to Brazos and Atoms which may share similar fate with Nano. But Brazos is not K8, it is K10.1 minus the features you dont need for mobile platform. You probably read to much article from Fuad which is 90% incorrect, 5% correct, 5% lies.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pogsnet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 04:42:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22717-via-shows-off-its-first-quad-core#comment-22795</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Medallish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22717-via-shows-off-its-first-quad-core#comment-22791</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Surprised no one has point out that AMD have had a Mobile Phenom II Quadcore @ 1.8 and 1.6GHz with a 25W TDP since last year. And they should definitely have a higher than 10% performance compared to Brazos as they are based on Stars CPU's and Brazos is a cut down K8. Via should have worked on something better than this.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Medallish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 18:24:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22717-via-shows-off-its-first-quad-core#comment-22791</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>godrilla says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22717-via-shows-off-its-first-quad-core#comment-22744</link>
			<description><![CDATA[With Intel talking about Ivy-bridge based on 22nm and AMD is coming out with 32nm soon this 40nm quad-core seems late to the game (based on x86). If you take the next Windows 8 built into account ( which is compatible with ARM as well)by the time someone actually places this into their devices we will see more powerful and efficient product on the market!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>godrilla</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 17:32:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22717-via-shows-off-its-first-quad-core#comment-22744</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eugen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22717-via-shows-off-its-first-quad-core#comment-22699</link>
			<description><![CDATA[yes baby and after notebooks visit the desktop market maybe.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>eugen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 10:03:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22717-via-shows-off-its-first-quad-core#comment-22699</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
