<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel switching to PowerVR for next gen Atom</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel switching to PowerVR for next gen Atom</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:50:42 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22699/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Boomstick777 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22655</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Its an Atom CPU what did you expect? Its not designed for high end gaming... Even if it did have dx11 it sure as hell wouldn't be able to run any dx11 games, so why implement it? Lol]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Boomstick777</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 15:47:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22655</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Wolf88 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22654</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Shame on you Intel ! DX10.1 What the hell matter with you ! AMD is way way better at least they give DX11]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Wolf88</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 15:15:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22654</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bro_fist says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22638</link>
			<description><![CDATA[They are generous. If they do it, AMDfags will go bankrupt. :-|]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bro_fist</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 11:13:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22638</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22633</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If both intel and nvidia would grow a neuron, they could just combine their efforts and put something good out, but no... uptight CEO's won't allow that.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 09:06:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22633</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Blizzard says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22618</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I agree on your point, but indeed Intel maybe can create a good GPU, they tried, but will always have that delay of time and after all bring something non-competitive, best thing, is to buy nVidia, that is not for sale, for the moment, (and curious to see how AMD won't push very much pressure on nVidia to keep them competitive), if that happens we for sore all be lost in intel's monopoly, that is one of the reason way i take AMD part. Other part of buys you describe is not in idea to bring just smart people, but in 1st place for key patents those small companies posses (in many cases the science is made in Universities). Is much easier to buy an working process (and chipper in terms of time and cash) than to create one.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Blizzard</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 00:29:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22618</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22615</link>
			<description><![CDATA[They suck because they don't really try. They also sucked at their dedicated GPU because they wanted to do something weird, wild, and all new, instead of something sensible and conventional. This isn't the end of Intel licensing graphics.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 00:00:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22615</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pogsnet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22611</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's not about cash. It's about right people and right leadership. Even small companies can make better technologies with given small amount of funding necessary for them to design and create new one. It's where geniuses are born, out of necessity, out of curiousness and the likes. That's why bigger companies tend to buy smaller companies with technological background than building a new one. Best people are hard to find, you can't find genius people based on credentials, look steve jobs is a drop out, and many other scientists who made great inventions.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pogsnet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 23:20:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22611</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Blizzard says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22605</link>
			<description><![CDATA[what i want to say, that is, of how much cash you would have, you won't reinvent the periodic table that good like some one did for a period of life, with own experience and direction of specialization.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Blizzard</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 21:43:55 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22605</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Blizzard says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22603</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And AMD was the same, maybe more lame, until strategic buy that was one of most genius movement did! ok with big problems with huge loses in cash. But imagine how bad maybe AMD positioned now if that transaction did not come like that. AMD with huge loses in other part ATi with terrible loses and ... dead maybe... And for the question, legacy that ATi and nVidia have can't be just ignored - an direction of 25 years work just on that type of technology. The same as ARM vs Intel (hm... and here Intel can be more powerful than against GPU) the same is for nVidia the fact that they desperate need a processing unit...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Blizzard</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 21:03:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22603</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jermelescu says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22600</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Never understood why the big dog (INTEL) sucked so much at making a good gpu.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jermelescu</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 20:01:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22699-intel-switching-to-powervr-for-next-gen-atom#comment-22600</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
