<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>X79 detailed ready for Q4 Sandy Bridge E</title>
		<description>Discuss X79 detailed ready for Q4 Sandy Bridge E</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:59:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22679/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>gozzak says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22586</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I`ve always been a fan of Intel - but their disgracefull behavior towards USB3 should not be forgiven. It is obviously a deliberate tactic to manipulate the market, and I hope governments take action (and todatem I have opposed all action against MS or Intel).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>gozzak</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 16:41:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22586</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>deadspeedv says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22576</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well Z is right next to X so I can see the chance of a typo :P 14 SATA ports and 10 of them 6Gb/s. Coool]]></description>
			<dc:creator>deadspeedv</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 14:25:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22576</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22543</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There is a Z68 for the LGA1155 socket, that's where X68 went.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 09:15:23 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22543</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22542</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Too bad AMD isn't going to be able to compete on the high-end, else we might have gotten an eight-core. Intel isn't pushing USB4 3.0 because they have a competing technology. In all honesty, it's more promising long term. It's not like they're preventing OEMs from building USB 3.0 support into the motherboards, they're just not integrating it into the core logic. I don't see a big deal other than the $1 of extra build cost that's going to be passed onto consumers. I can handle that.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 09:14:43 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22542</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GeekLyfe says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22510</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I hope AMD brings a challenge to the table against Intel with their bulldozer. Intel needs to drop their prices on CPU which we all know that will not happen unless AMD gives them a run for their money.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GeekLyfe</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 18:16:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22510</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22500</link>
			<description><![CDATA[does amd have a usb 3.0 board? bulldozer maybe? im sure intel will release the x69.5 with 3.0..... socket 2012 of course.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 15:54:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22500</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Otherbuns says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22493</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What the heck does Intel have against consistency these days? P35 -> P45 -> P55 -> ... P67? Looks like a freaking typo. And X38 -> X48 -> X58 -> ...X79? Are they drunk? What happened to X68?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Otherbuns</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 15:08:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22493</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22491</link>
			<description><![CDATA[originally intended for server market with 4 pci-e running at 8x? well no usb 3.0, at least we get a pci slot!!!!!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 15:00:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22491</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Countess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22476</link>
			<description><![CDATA[they want to shove the expensive and incompatible thunderbolt down everybody's throats, and apple wants to help them.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Countess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 13:23:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22476</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>vaidasif says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22470</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Looks like intel knows only usb 2.0. Somebody needs to inform them that usb 3.0 is ready :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>vaidasif</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 12:23:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22679-x79-detailed-ready-for-q4-sandy-bridge-e#comment-22470</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
