<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel Sandy Bridge put to the test</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel Sandy Bridge put to the test</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:13:54 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22655/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>anno says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22526</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Very nice review! Again, thanks a ton for adding the platform cost comparison. I'm surprised about how poorly the SB i3 compares. AMD, with its 'ancient' architecture, can keep up fine there. I guess Intel castrated it a bit too much. But the SB i5 is doing pretty good! I wonder whether AMD can hope to match that.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>anno</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 21:53:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22526</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdfighter says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22440</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Pretty good review. Next time you could include a couple more gaming benchmarks, like Crysis, which is a CPU-intensive game.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdfighter</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 07:30:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22440</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eugen says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22427</link>
			<description><![CDATA[it`s no huge difference between these cpu`s maybe in oc mode but amd has none 32nm cpu for desktop at least if only 10 or fps in games its not worth the upgrade ..i don`t get it what happened to whole sse5 future stuff??]]></description>
			<dc:creator>eugen</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 01:39:38 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22427</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22421</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ivy Bridge is next, in all its trigate 3D glory. AMD better get their act together and ARM better get a x86 license :lol:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 23:51:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22421</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PlasmaBomb says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22407</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Damn, I was hoping this was about socket 2011...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>PlasmaBomb</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 19:06:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22407</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dishayu says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22401</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I didn't read the article for why this is published now, but i'm guessing surely there has been a mistake?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dishayu</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 17:42:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22401</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BernardP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22384</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A question: looking at Asus and Gigabyte web sites, I don't see support for Xeon Sandy Bridge CPUs on their regular P67 motherboards. How can I make sure that the Xeon E3-1230 is compatible with a given Socket 1155 motherboard?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BernardP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 14:35:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22384</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BernardP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22382</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes, it's late, but Thanks Mr. Kucharik: You consistently have the most useful CPU reviews, because of pertinent overclocking/undervolting/overvolting/power consumption information. Also other CPUs in the comparison are relevant.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BernardP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 14:26:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22382</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Otherbuns says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22380</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow, already?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Otherbuns</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 12:58:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22380</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Blacky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22378</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Brilliant review! Thank you.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Blacky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 12:36:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22655-intel-sandy-bridge-put-to-the-test#comment-22378</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
