<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Sandy Bridge E specs tip up online</title>
		<description>Discuss Sandy Bridge E specs tip up online</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:51:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22474/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21279</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's funny, no one else extrapolates this information into a four core and a six core product line. In reality, no one knows what intel's going to do for this line of chips. Well, except maybe intel.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 05:58:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21279</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jonelsorel says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21277</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Either your sources aren't that quick to inform you, Fudzilla, or you're not too keen to do that yourselves. This is one week old news - broke out 04.12. http://www.hardocp.com/news/2011/04/12/leaked_intel_roadmap_reveals_sandy_bridgee_ivy_bridge http://www.crunchgear.com/2011/04/12/leaked-intel-roadmap-holds-no-big-surprises/ http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/leaked_intel_roadmap_shows_sandy_bridge-e]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jonelsorel</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:13:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21277</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>youserzero says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21186</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well unfortunately for you sir reality says otherwise. ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>youserzero</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:03:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21186</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>actionjksn says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21157</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Easy for AMD to keep same socket since they never offer any new architecture. Intel actually introduces new technology instead of just changing cache and higher clocks. It's also why they can get more $ out of their stuff. Let AMD actually do something truly new and see if your stuff works. If it does it won't work as well as Intel's Processors. Face it Intel has to dumb their CPU's down just to make them run like AMD chips.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>actionjksn</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:09:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21157</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21140</link>
			<description><![CDATA[BUT BUT BUT Six cores! D:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:14:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21140</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Boomstick777 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21139</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Does this mean no 6 or 8 core on 1155 p67? Im happy with my 2600k for now, 4.6ghz at 1.32 volts. Performance is overkill tbh. Next year I would of liked to have been able to upgrade to an 8 core Ivybridge (purely for epeen) on my same p67 1155 B3 motherboard, will be a shame if Intel don't release more than 4 core on 1155?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Boomstick777</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:03:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21139</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Exodite says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21137</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The question is, will S2011 be the new S1366 in every way? That's to say vastly more expensive than the mainstream platform while offering no real advantage. Cue i7 930 vs. i5 760 comparisons. Let's hope S2011 gets a 22nm refresh when Ivy Bridge comes around, if not it's as pointless as its predecessor.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Exodite</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:53:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21137</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21131</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You mad, brah?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:54:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21131</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21125</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am amazed there is not an 8-core Extreme Edition and then the others are 6-core. I don't see what is going to make them so much faster than the current Sandy Bridge set up that will make the massive price difference. Especially if overclocking is limited! From what i can see the expensive high-end versions have more cache and more memory channels, neither will set the benchmarks alight. plus they are going to be closely followed by 22nm Ivy Bridge which will probably end up faster. What a waste of time and money!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:56:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21125</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21105</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Uh, not all Sandy and Ivy Bridge processors use the same socket. They're split over two sockets, LGA1155 and LGA2011. I was seriously hoping for eight cores, I could use eight cores in a single socket setup. Looks like I'll have to go Xeon to get that. I don't see what the big deal with changing motherboards is. It's a fact of life. LGA1366 is three years old, going to another socket on the high-end should be absolutely no surprise. LGA1156 was definitely too short lived, but everyone knew that it would be before it even launched. Don't whine about things that you should have been aware of going in.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:31:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22474-sandy-bridge-e-specs-tip-up-online#comment-21105</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
