<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nvidia outs 270.61 WHQL drivers</title>
		<description>Discuss Nvidia outs 270.61 WHQL drivers</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:24:20 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22456/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>txsouthpaw says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-22187</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nvidia FTW]]></description>
			<dc:creator>txsouthpaw</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 08:57:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-22187</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>robert3892 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21078</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Very poor surround performance from these drivers. I personally recommend users who make use of surround to roll back to the previous WHQL driver set]]></description>
			<dc:creator>robert3892</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:26:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21078</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>crackerz says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21073</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I HATE this hyperbole from ALL the companies. I'm not taking any sides but all the time companies says lot of bull. For instance in this article it says "..350% in Left 4 Dead 2.." so if you have a humble nvidia card with 20fps you should get 70fps up with a total of 90fps!! Some might say no no no for that model, so 350% is bullshit. Same bullshit amd claims, also other companies. I have an OCZ Vertex 2 SSD(60GB) which claims 275mb/s write and 285mb/s read, 275/285 my ass. Also it suppose to be 50.000 iops(4k), I get ~15.000 which isn't bad BUT not even close to 50k. DAMN ALL companies with such lies, its all about marketing]]></description>
			<dc:creator>crackerz</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:30:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21073</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Warrior24_7 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21070</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Scared of DUNG beetles? Why? What stupid beetle brought an $h!tty990?!! That should answer your question right there. :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Warrior24_7</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:50:24 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21070</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jonny80s says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21066</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Petrify the turd... then polish it. Now if only they would make tri and quad sli work with 3D Vision (equally distribute the load across 3 and 4 gpus). I have one 295 running @ 80-90% and the other running at 20-30%. Giving me on average 45FPS in 3D. Oh and a 250 carrying the physics load (when it's available). I was going to make an anti-AMD/ATI comment, but that would only fuel their rage. They're like Mets fans, but annoying and numerous. Flame all you want it's always good for a laugh. Now... back to enjoying 3D Vision running on the new 270.61 drivers.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jonny80s</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:48:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21066</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Magnetawan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21062</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Its sad when the nvidia camp has no ground to stand on. I'm going on a decade without troubles from AMD/ATI drivers. Can't say the same about NV. Remember all those blue screens showing nvlddmkm.sys as the culprit. Come on, don't deny it. Nvidia spends all their money on their other divisions and leaves their GeForce crown with incompetent drivers.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Magnetawan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:42:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21062</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Drac says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21060</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Spot on mate,brilliant comment +10000 Well,considerin g amd fanboys have such douchebags like DAN,no wonder overall amd fanboy IQ is less than standard,thats why amd fans still coming to leave idiotic "comments" on this site,which they accusing of faworing NV.Well,what can you expect from spotty teenagers flooding every site with word NVIDIA :D LOL-amd fanboys got owned by NV driver-comedy :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Drac</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:33:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21060</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The blue fox says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21058</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Look at all these AMD fan boys insulting nvidia drivers. Forgetting that there drivers are just as bad. At Least Nvidia driver aren't plastered full of add's]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The blue fox</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:47:24 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21058</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BernardP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21049</link>
			<description><![CDATA[NVidia drivers have something that ATI/AMD could do but won't do: the ability to create and GPU-scale any custom resolution. My presbyobic eyes are grateful to Nvidia for the custom 1536 x 960 resolution on my Dell 24 inch 16:10 monitor. AFAIK, there is no way to get such a resolution with AMD graphics drivers.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BernardP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:08:55 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21049</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>inaphasia says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21027</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Mr. Awesome You're absolutely right. Optimus has been crashing YouTube since January. That's 3 whole months! Guess what nVIDIA says the fix is: disabling hardware acceleration for Flash! In other words all you need is an Intel proc :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>inaphasia</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:21:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22456-nvidia-outs-27061-whql-drivers#comment-21027</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
