<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>RIM Playbook gets blasted by reviewers</title>
		<description>Discuss RIM Playbook gets blasted by reviewers</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:57:46 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22436/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>DaRAGE says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20931</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bah to all you backward people. I like the authors writing style and all the funny quirky names brought out in Fudzilla. The fact is it cant do email... and hooking a smartphone up to a blackberry to use the Tablet is just downright backward in nature, and a bother. Make something a breeze and simple to use and it will be liked. Make something hard and difficult to do is a pain in the ass and a waste of the customers time. Poor job RIM]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DaRAGE</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:36:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20931</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>grndzro says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20930</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This guy is utterly retarded....the playbook model in question is the one designed to be tethered to a smartphone. It dosen't even have to be Blackberry smartphone. He also fails to mention the WiFi model, and the Upcomming 3G playbook. Fud this author needs to be dragged out in the street and shot.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>grndzro</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 00:11:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20930</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jozef says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20904</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Please don't put words in my mouth. I've only ever had issue with the one-sided garbage Farrell regurgitates.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jozef</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 18:57:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20904</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Calabros says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20889</link>
			<description><![CDATA[one day you wish Fud drop Fuad, and one day wish drop Nick both are cool guys. have any problem with them? stick with Pogue not funny at all articles]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Calabros</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:43:28 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20889</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jozef says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20888</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I wish Fud would drop Nick Farrel.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jozef</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 07:28:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20888</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>riciux says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20871</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As long as they can deliver "secure email and other key services" at later AND not-so-far away date, I think it's alright.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>riciux</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:55:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20871</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ASilver says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20867</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I found the comment on the NYT really disappointing. I don't actually have any opinion on them, but it is completely irrelevant to the article. What Pogue didn't say abut iPad has NOTHING to do with the article, and what is worse, the article then quotes other sources completely AGREEING with the NYT comment. So in other words, the author here makes gratuitious shots at the NYT while saying they are 100% correct. FWIW, I don't have a single Apple product (last one was an Apple II back in the day), but the endless anti-Apple bias making up excuses to use the term Job's Mob, or some other slam of Apple is utterly unprofessional.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ASilver</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:18:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20867</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jigar says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20852</link>
			<description><![CDATA[thanks for the laugh... :lol:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jigar</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:16:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22436-rim-playbook-gets-blasted-by-reviewers#comment-20852</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
