<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>GTX 590 Quad SLI tested</title>
		<description>Discuss GTX 590 Quad SLI tested</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:26:25 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22430/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Steve-O says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20942</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No eyefinity or NV surround? Total fail of an article...Nothing to see here folks move along, move along.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Steve-O</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:01:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20942</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Warrior24_7 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20939</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Then stay away from two $h!tty990s!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Warrior24_7</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:49:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20939</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20938</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Putting two turds in a system isn't any better than one. Except it stinks of shit twice as bad.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:51:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20938</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wolfdale says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20925</link>
			<description><![CDATA[depends.. if you use 7680×3200 resolution like i posted earlier.. you wouldnt need a scope to see your long range snipe-food :) the details will be so immensely magnified due to a native resolution instead of scaled up resolution, with true anti aliasing you should be able to make very, very nice shots in the distance :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wolfdale</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 14:17:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20925</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Boomstick777 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20923</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yeah im talking about the production, apparently AMD have the desktop version in production already.. They can lauch mobile or desktop whenever period they want this year and still be ahead of Nvidia's lauch? Some rumours say July 2011 but that may be just notebook 28nm etc. Looking forward to the next gen, want a HD 7990]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Boomstick777</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 10:39:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20923</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jermelescu says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20915</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD's CF > Nvidia's SLI It's a fact.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jermelescu</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 01:16:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20915</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JEskandari says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20910</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well you know hardware canucks have other Idea http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/41903-nvidia-geforce-gtx-590-3gb-review-23.html you see they are the same]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JEskandari</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 00:40:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20910</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JEskandari says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20908</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well you hardware canucks have other Idea http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/41903-nvidia-geforce-gtx-590-3gb-review-23.html you see they are the same]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JEskandari</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 00:39:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20908</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cartman says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20906</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i wonder does Nvidia bundles Nuclear powerplant with that quad setup :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Cartman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 00:29:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20906</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20901</link>
			<description><![CDATA[1099 Watts is pretty extreme for almost any purpose. All the eye candy does not make an FPS player shoot better...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 18:18:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22430-gtx-590-quad-sli-tested#comment-20901</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
