<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD introduces low end HD 6450</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD introduces low end HD 6450</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:09:19 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22352/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Harry Lloyd says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20438</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Very nice. The 5450, which I have in my HTPC, has a TDP of 19 W. The faster version should've been called 6470, but it doesn't really matter in this segment. I might upgrade one day, as I play older games on my HTPC, not my gaming PC.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Harry Lloyd</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:46:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20438</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Haberlandt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20422</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Exactly what I was going to say.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Haberlandt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 05:03:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20422</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Memristor says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20363</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Here is a review of this card which shows double the performance of the HD5450 in 3DMark Vantage. http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-6450-review/1]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Memristor</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:09:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20363</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20362</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Forget SI, where's CI ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:02:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20362</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Memristor says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20360</link>
			<description><![CDATA[They are available, but only as a OEM cards. HP sells a system with the HD6570 Turks card. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883147699&Tpk=HD6570 But you're right, a passive cooled HD6570 would make a great card for a media center.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Memristor</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:59:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20360</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20356</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sharpening his sword. Why? You want your throat cut? /cynicism... the funny version Don't mind it, it will be here when it will, it's not like the part will be super popular with reviewers and talked about all over the web. Where's SI? /rhetoric]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:51:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20356</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20346</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Great! Now, where's Turks?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:13:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20346</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Steve-O says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20341</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Underwhelmed? Actually yes, I'm not that impressed with the performance of a 6970 over a 5870, until you get into 3 screen action, which it excels at.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Steve-O</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 11:36:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20341</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JAB Creations says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20340</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Arrogant much? Cards from both AMD and Nvidia play the games just fine unless you're blindly materialistic.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JAB Creations</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 10:59:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22352-amd-introduces-low-end-hd-6450#comment-20340</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
