<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Non-reference GTX 590 should follow up shortly</title>
		<description>Discuss Non-reference GTX 590 should follow up shortly</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:11:01 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22208/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Nemtrac says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19211</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dont be a rasist ;) if ther is a place for a Warrior24_7 then the ATI camp schould haw thair own moron. :-* Or is it a conspiracy and they are both Fudzilla staff and try to generate lots of clicks on the thumb up and down ? We need a FRINGE investigator! :lol:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nemtrac</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:01:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19211</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>blackdragon1230 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19163</link>
			<description><![CDATA[box should say fire extinguisher included. lol]]></description>
			<dc:creator>blackdragon1230</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:34:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19163</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>1d10t says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19158</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i know...factory overclocked will come with switches.Switch 1 says "Standard Mode" and switch 2 says "May God have mercy on your soul"]]></description>
			<dc:creator>1d10t</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:14:28 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19158</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>blackdragon1230 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19145</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I agree with Regenweald... Dan please stop with the childish comments. Can he be banned... please? At least try to keep your comments reasonable.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>blackdragon1230</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:00:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19145</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>redisnidma says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19143</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I would take an Nvidia GTX590 factory overclocked card ONLY if it comes bundled with a fire extinguisher. :P]]></description>
			<dc:creator>redisnidma</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:52:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19143</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>razorleaf says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19140</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Gigabyte GTX 470 Superclocked is better and cheaper than Cayman, so NVIDIA has a design win in my PC :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>razorleaf</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:36:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19140</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Regenweald says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19138</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As things stand, that is really unlikely. Thanks to scaling and power efficiency(a relative term IMO when talking about these dual GPU monsters), the 6990 can have higher clocks than the 580, thusly in the leaked canned benches at extremely retarded resolutions (seriously, who benches a 6990 or 590 on a single screen at 1920x1200) the 590 does not say very much. Across multiple screes at high res, expect the 590 to lose by a margin. But it will still be damn fast, count on that ;-) Dan, please stop. please :o]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Regenweald</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:03:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19138</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19137</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately for you and all of the other Huang ass feeders, that is not to be. The 590 does not beat the 6990 in any meaningful test. It might have a couple of % on it at VERY LOW resolutions.. but WTF, who buys a card like that for 1024x768? Where it really counts, higher res with AA, the 590 is simply owned by the 6990. For less $. For less power. And the 6990 doesn't leave you stinking of SHIT.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:59:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19137</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>razorleaf says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19135</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I really hope that when GTX 590 will totally annihilate HD 6990 in every posible way, it will also put an end to those compasions of single and dual GPU's.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>razorleaf</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:52:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19135</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cartman says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19127</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Reference card is still not out but stories about non reference are out :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Cartman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:07:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22208-non-reference-gtx-590-should-follow-up-shortly#comment-19127</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
