<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>More Llano specs surface</title>
		<description>Discuss More Llano specs surface</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:56:55 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22131/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18582</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If you're that GPU constrained, you probably need a dedicated card.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:30:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18582</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18568</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@pchacker "I think AMD has the win for best cpu to graphics ratio in this one." I think are exactly correct. :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:59:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18568</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18564</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No one stated clocks... they're to be determined, which means later we'll get some leaked info about them. Also 125W is not on the table... these won't go past 100W and four of the eleven are already at this figure.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 04:04:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18564</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bbo320 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18559</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm waiting for the 95w ~ 125w APUs. I want more than the low end.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bbo320</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:30:50 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18559</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pchacker says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18558</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think AMD has the win for best cpu to graphics ratio in this one. Some of the lower models i.e 65w would make a good htpc chip.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pchacker</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:12:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18558</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18527</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Pete, those Propus cores were using around 60W in real world tests, not 95W. It's easy to confuse the readers when equaling TDP with power consumption. If the system had potential, for 95W they could go a lot higher. You also forgot to mention it is socket FM1, so people don't get ideas about Llano being AM3+. rundll, you've forgot your 32, jokes aside, think of the GPU as a dedicated beefed-up Floating Point Unit that otherwise would have been in the CPU anyway, but which doesn't run on x86 but OpenCL, DirectX etc. It's still a valid processing unit and a lot of us want to make use of it. I personally can't wait to get my hands on one of these and code an app to see how far it goes. It has a lot of potential.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:11:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18527</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>guideX says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18508</link>
			<description><![CDATA[how r those negs treating ya ? The E-350's turned out EVEN better when they were released to market, Intel was taken by surprise and now Atom has been left in the dust. AMD has a solid team of engineers, one that has proven to embarrass Intel in the past, they'll do it again.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>guideX</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:55:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18508</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>adv says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18501</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm gpu constrained 40% of the time I'm cpu constrained 10% of the time I'm hdd constrained 40% of the time I'm bus constrained 5% of the time I'm mem constrained 5% of the time So what do I need ? Cpu ? Nope, a system, a SSD and a gpu is currently whats missing from laptops. this could bring what I need, if the quads are rather cheap then it's all good ( mobile) Couldnt care less about cpu speed is amazing or not.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>adv</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:51:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18501</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>rundll says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18498</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD showed off it's Llano test rig in CeBit. The test set up was made up such a manner that AMD of course came out as a winner. But the set up was so unreal - at least for me. Many graphic performance dependent apps running simultaneously and then counting FPS. Yawn. To me it is obvious. AMD will gain the IGP grown and will be cheaper. Intel will win the CPU race and be less power hungry.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>rundll</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:24:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18498</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18491</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Leaked benchmarks have already shown that Llano annihilates Sandy Bridge where it counts: i.e. anything that needs even a small amount of graphics processing. All that at lower power consumption, and most likely lower price.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:45:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22131-more-llano-specs-surface#comment-18491</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
