<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Bulldozer is four to eight cores</title>
		<description>Discuss Bulldozer is four to eight cores</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 10:50:48 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22065/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>123s says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18204</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So you have one already or how else do you know ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>123s</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 08:24:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18204</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JBG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18198</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Do we have any information yet on the bulldozer desktop CPU (Zembezi?) MEMORY CONTROLLER? Dual Channel? Tripple Channel? Quad Channel?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JBG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 05:36:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18198</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Regenweald says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18132</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Fudo, you're the only person on the web going on about AMD chipset issues. The only other link I can find is at dv hardware, and their tidbit starts: 'fudzilla reports....' are you being naughty Fuad ? ;-) Usually I head to digitimes for PR plants.....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Regenweald</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:16:22 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18132</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18111</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sorry guys, Bulldozer will definitely be faster than Phenom II but it will not be an Intel killer. Don't forget Ivy Bridge will be going 6 and 8 core and also be 20% faster than Sandy Bridge. http://vr-zone.com/articles/ivy-bridge-to-have-20-percent-performance-advantage-over-sandy-bridge/11061.html]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:45:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18111</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18097</link>
			<description><![CDATA[terrace215 I am not talking about Sandybridge of today, I am talking about tomorrows SandyBridge. Bulldozer is coming late June 2011. What ever Intel has released or scheduled for release will be in direct competition to what ever AMD plans on releasing in that time frame. Unless AMD plans on winning w/ price/performance. Though it would seem AMD is very eager to get into a posision so they can sell as much as possible and that is by coming out with something that is faster than it's competition. I've heard that the new Bulldozer CPU's should be approx: 150% faster than current Phenom II X4/X6 CPU's in gaming and multi-threaded apps, and even better in single threaded apps. If this is true, then where does it leave Core i7 (SandyBridge)...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:11:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18097</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cartman says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18065</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Another article where you dint read any real news. Bulldozer is four to eight cores ... no shit Einstein]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Cartman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:10:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18065</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18034</link>
			<description><![CDATA[They didnt but a ~40% increase is very likely. :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:22:28 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18034</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>terrace215 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18026</link>
			<description><![CDATA[SuperXP: No. There's a lot of misinformation in your post: - Current SandyB socket 1155 parts ARE branded Core i7 / i5 / i3,also. - AMD positioned Llano against these parts, but it's late, Intel will be at 22nm soon after llano launches. - The "summer" Bulldozer parts compete with the not-yet-launched SB-E Socket-R (2011) parts: 4,6,8-core parts, each core with 2 HT threads. - BD is a server-optimized arch, and will fare (relatively) poorly on most client apps.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>terrace215</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:08:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18026</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>leftiszi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18024</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I was referring to this. http://vr-zone.com/articles/rumour-bulldozer-50-faster-than-core-i7-950-and-phenom-ii-x6-1100t/10819.html I don't know if it's a bogus rumor. That's why I said "or not" at the end of the sentence. For competition's sake, I hope it's true!;)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>leftiszi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:51:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18024</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18008</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What is it with companies, go figure, AMD picks the very last month in the Q2 2011 to release Bulldozer, many were hoping for a late April or very early May launch. Anyway, it’s finally going to become reality. Let's just clarify something because there’s a lot of miss-information being spread all over the net. This version of Bulldozer coming out in June 2011 is meant to compete directly w/ Intel's SandyBride. The Phenom II’s were already meant to compete with Intel’s previous design, the Core i7's etc.. By AMD concentrating on trying to compete with Intel’s previous generation of CPU’s it would be suicide. Phenom II already took care of that with price/performance, and so now it’s time to move on.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:58:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22065-bulldozer-is-four-to-eight-cores#comment-18008</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
