<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD shows a lot of Fusion wins</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD shows a lot of Fusion wins</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:04:22 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22020/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17821</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Bl0bb3r 2011-03-07 22:59 I agree. AMD innovated it's way out of a hole with the Athlon. It innovated it's way into a few years of solid profits with AMD64. The market benefited. As for gov't purchasing: "nobody ever got fired for buying IBM", private or public sector. Gov't is no more guilty in this manner than private sector. I have a somewhat jaundiced view in general of the "capitalist innovation paradigm", it is often used as ideological jargon, and just look at the patent wars for an example of how private sector *[edit] sometimes* suppresses innovation. But the paradigm can work: AMD is an exemplar. The more so because cost-of-entry in the CPU business is so high. ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 05:00:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17821</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17820</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Downvotes I do not normally respond to down votes, if only because I am not above occasionally posting flame bait. In this case I must. My posts about the ASUS E35M1-M PRO mobo were motivated by hoping that (1) someone could tell me what I should do to make my RAID card work; (2) someone could explain what the RAM problem is. Fudzilla has a lot of smart posters, I was hoping for insight. If you look at my past posts I have been positive wrt AMD Ontario/Brazos, and about my c50 netbook and how well it works. I cannot be accused of trying to damn AMD. WRT the ASUS board: other people are posting on ASUS VIP forum describing similar problems. There appear to be real issues with the board... please don't shoot the messenger.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:39:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17820</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17809</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Plus a healthy income from the user sector, which was swayed through better bench results, even is price wasn't always as good as AMD's offering. AMD doesn't have that kind of exposure or at least it didn't used to have. For now Bobcat is only limited by TSMC as performance wise it seems that OEM's like it. This might be the end of Atom as a profitable part, but only might. If TSMC doesn't expand fast, intel can counter with faster supply. As for Fusion parts, don't looks at them like intel's offerings. It's not that simple and if it were, we had Westmere for a while now... wowed no one because of the extremely poor GPU. If you take an AMD GPU, that is so much more flexible and from here on things progress even further.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 23:14:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17809</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17808</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think it is normal to have high expectations from AMD since they innovate every time, while intel only plays the multiple dev-team card, luckily they have them so if a project fails, one will be there to continue making them money. The profitability of intel pretty much stemmed form the fact that AMD doesn't have high-end killer products. So obviously intel made cash through advertisement, waving the crown in front of everyone. I also noticed most government purchased hw, for schools and universities is on intel. Atoms might have disappointed in the consumer market but they were adopted by a lot of the small devices makers, nas, router.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:59:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17808</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17769</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It seems that AMD underestimated demand for Brazos & Ontario. Here's hoping AMD can ramp up production quickly because I do think Ontario & Brazos can be breakthrough products for AMD just like Athlon and AMD64 were. My weird Brazos memory & RAID problem are probably edge cases as far as the market in general is concerned.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 01:54:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17769</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17768</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Another problem. My PERC 5 has an IRQ problem on this board. Depending on how I set the graphics in the BIOS, the PERC may not even show up in lspci nor will it's BIOS be invoked at boot up! Others on the intertubes report similar problem with this ASUS board using 3Ware, LSI, Areca, and Adaptec PCIe RAID controllers. This is very uncool. I and other people want to use Brazos boards as NFS/SMB file servers. I am hoping this RAID card problem is an ASUS-only thing.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 01:43:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17768</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17767</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I do not strongly disagree with you though I think AMD has a very good position also in very high core-count servers. The 12 core Opterons in 4 socket boxes are something that Intel cannot touch. It's a pretty high margin market segment, but of course it is not a very large segment :-( So, I'm still waiting for Bulldozer lol!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 01:36:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17767</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17766</link>
			<description><![CDATA[QUESTION FOR YOU GUYS AND GALS Strange problem with Brazos: I just bought an ASUS E35M1-M PRO mobo, stuck a 4GB DIMM from the supported memory list in it. BIOS reports 4GB RAM. I set the GPU RAM allocation to 256MB, installed OpenSuSE 11.3 64 bit Linux. "free -m" says I have 2761MB total RAM, rather than the approx 3.75GB I expected. Changing the GPU RAM allocation changes the total RAM accordingly but always about 1 GB less than I would expect. So I am missing about a GB of RAM somewhere. Has anyone else seen this kind of thing? Edit: Linux reports erroneous total RAM, Win7 does not. Sucks... I'm a Linux guy lol.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 01:28:22 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17766</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>rickster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17765</link>
			<description><![CDATA[While I may not agree with some of your points, I can agree that Fusion is AMDs money tree for the year. But I think too many people here have to high expectations for the year. First, while the consumer market is a lucrative one, it's just one slice of the pie. Intel is still slapping AMD silly in the other sectors. Second, they're having troubles with their top position members. And they're obviously having issues supplying their partners. And not everybody will early adopt Fusion. It's because of all those reasons I'm giving AMD only a 2-3% market share increase for the year. I did get an option for AMD if by chance I'm wrong. Either way, whether AMD does average or beats Wall street numbers, I make money anyways :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>rickster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 01:12:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17765</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bugsy1339 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17760</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Marketing by AMD would be nice but not really critical as OEM's have been waiting for an opportunity beat their competitors by building different machines. Brazos, Llano, and bulldozer gives them alot to work with as they are all very different in technology from intel. Also, if Intel cant continue their sweetheart deals like in the past you might see more of an adoption of amd product which i think we are starting to see with Brazos. This fusion idea might be just the thing to win some of Apple's business as well. If Amd gets that CEO situation worked out soon they are set up for a great run here. IMHO of coarse!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bugsy1339</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 18:42:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/22020-amd-shows-a-lot-of-fusion-wins#comment-17760</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
