<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Asus shows its Z68 based motherboard</title>
		<description>Discuss Asus shows its Z68 based motherboard</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:31:09 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21975/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17458</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have 5 2TB drives, I don't consider it excessive. I do consider it dangerous. I'm going to just forget about doing internal RAIDs (excepting mirrors) and get a Drobo Pro. I'll have 18TB (with 3TB drives) and dual redundancy. I have a Procurve 1810-24G gigabit switch which will become a dedicated storage switch. It'll only handle iSCSI traffic.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:20:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17458</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17394</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Best P67 board i've seen is the Asrock Fatal1ty P67 Professional: 6x SATA-3 4x SATA-2 1 x eSATA3 2 x Front USB 3.0 ports 4 x Rear USB 3.0 ports and actually comes with a Front USB 3.0 Panel. Looks sweet too: http://www.asrock.com/mb/overview.asp?Model=Fatal1ty%20P67%20Professional]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:09:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17394</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17392</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Naterm No RAID array I just don't like deleting stuff! I have 2 SATA disk drives, blu-ray player and dvd writer and an SSD for my OS. This just leaves 3 left for normal storage. Yes i could go and buy 3 x 3Tb drives but people don't shop like that, they just buy a new drive when they run out and keep their old drive going. So i have 3 x 1Tb drives and 3 x 2Tb drives. It sounds excessive but i've had a HD camcorder for about 5 years and add in games, photos, programmes and back ups and you soon run out of space. Point is, how much can an extra sata chip cost? $5? $10? Just seem really penny pinching to give only 6.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:04:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17392</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17389</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If you need more than six SATA ports then you're probably running a large RAID. If you're running a large RAID you should have a dedicated HBA that supports RAID 6. RAID 5 just isn't enough redundancy with high capacity SATA disks.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:43:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17389</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17379</link>
			<description><![CDATA[oh yeah, and 6 SATA ports is a joke!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:39:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17379</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BernardP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17339</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just give us a m-ATX boad with the Z68 chipset, full features and solid power circuitry. It's only a small minority who wants to run multiple GPUs. A single GPU can be more than fast enough.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BernardP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:06:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17339</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Naterm says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17338</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You're not going to get baseclock overclocking with Sandy Bridge-DT. Considering the availability of cheap, unlocked processors for the platform I really fail to see the big deal. Everyone has always wanted unlocked multipliers. Until they're available at the expense of bclock bumps, in which case they want that back. You can't please everyone.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Naterm</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:03:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17338</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17336</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Surpriiiiiise! @loadwick, it was only rumored it would be a good OC'er... but given intel's recent dealings it figures.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:56:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17336</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17334</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I thought there was talk about the Z68 being the true overclocker's board. I thought this might mean base clock overclocking? Is this not the case then if it's nothing more than a P67 with DVI? I think Intel really shafted people with their SB chipsets. H67 won't overclock, P67 can't use graphics and more of an issue can't use QuickSync, then the recall which maybe wasn't Intel's fault but maybe they knew about it and thats why the Z68 didn't coming out until it was resolved so its 'best' mobo didn't muddy its name. I say this because why would Intel release two chipsets with such obvious draw backs? I can only think because people could buy the Z68 but then they didn't release this for 4 months, after the SATA problem goes away!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:15:23 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21975-asus-shows-its-z68-based-motherboard#comment-17334</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
