<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel about to miss the boat on EUV</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel about to miss the boat on EUV</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21968-intel-about-to-miss-the-boat-on-euv</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:01:50 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21968/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21968-intel-about-to-miss-the-boat-on-euv#comment-17236</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well, did they fix those mask problems or not? "still stands a good chance" tells me "not yet but we might". Even if double patterning is more expensive, an unworkable and expensive NGL isn't desired either.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:00:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21968-intel-about-to-miss-the-boat-on-euv#comment-17236</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
