<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title> High End Sandy Bridge E in at least three SKUs</title>
		<description>Discuss  High End Sandy Bridge E in at least three SKUs</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:40:51 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21902/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>genetix says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-17329</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It the socket is 4 or 6 cores it will be LGA 1356 not LGA2011 by any chance. Memory will be triple channel and these will be 'Sandy Bridge-EN'(2-6 cores) not 'E'. LGA2011 will have EP models and those are for servers(2-8 cores) not for high-end. Also to be noted that release time is completely incorrect. It will not be Q4/2011 by any chance, if it will be Q4/2011 it will be Q1/2012 and that would indeed be the LGA2011 and it would 100% sure be 22nm not 32nm cores we talk about. LGA1356 however would be pretty safe to assume it will come out on early Q3/2011.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>genetix</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:50:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-17329</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16911</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Systemlord: Gulftown is part of Westmere. @Harry Lloyd: Those last three lines were exactly my point, unless you're trying to imply that Core is both an architecture and a microarchitectu re, which isn't really true. You were getting too technical. Architecture and microarchitectu re are sometimes used interchangeably .]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:14:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16911</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Harry Lloyd says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16910</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And Bulldozer has no simmilarities to K8. It's a completely new design, and it's not similar to anything else. It introduces a completely new core layout - modules. Cores withing the modules share stuff like the FP unit and L2 cache, but they're still separate cores, unlike Intel's HyperThreading cores. A Bulldozer module will be faster than a single Intel HT core, and desktop Bulldozer CPUs will feature up to four modules at first, so they'll be faster than Intel quad core CPUs with HT, but not as fast as six-core Intel CPUs. A module will be pretty much the same size as a normal single core currently available. Bulldozer server processors will feature up to eight modules (actually two 4-module CPUs on the same package).]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Harry Lloyd</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:13:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16910</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Harry Lloyd says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16908</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@TechHog Do you have any idea how long it takes to develop an architecture? Many many years. Have you actually read the specifications of all three architecutres since Core? I guess not, because they're all similar. They add new instructions, add more cache, reduce cache latency, reduce pipeline length, integrate features and more stuff like that. They take the existing architecture (Core), and modify it. When they do a shrink, they just make some minor changes. When they do many changes (from the list above), they call it a new MICROarchitecut re. A microarchitectu re is part of a MACROarchitectu re, or simply an architecture. Core is a MACROarchitectu re, Nehalem and Sandy Bridge are MICROarchitectu res.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Harry Lloyd</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:05:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16908</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Systemlord says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16898</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Why would you associate 22nm being only for Ivy Bridge? Intel came out with Nehalem (45nm) and then decided to release a 6 core Core i7 980X Gulftown 32nm version on the same chipset without needing a newer motherboard, so for the Core i7 line of processors we already on 32nm. My point is this could be repeated with Sandy Bridge in the same way.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Systemlord</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:21:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16898</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16888</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Also, to whoever gave my correct comments the downvote and Harry's incorrect comments the upvote, please learn to do a little research. I'm sure we all know about Intel's Tick-Tock strategy? http://www.intel.com/technology/tick-tock/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 04:26:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16888</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16887</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think 22nm will be saved for Ivy Bridge E or whatever they decide to call it. Why call it Sandy Bridge at all if it's 22nm, which makes it more similar to Ivy Bridge?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 04:17:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16887</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Systemlord says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16885</link>
			<description><![CDATA[More likely than not the Sandy Bridge E (LGA 2011) could easily see 22nm versions, because the 980X and 990X are 32nm already. I'm less concerned about a die shrink than a new microarchitectu re.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Systemlord</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 01:58:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16885</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16875</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And where are you getting your info? Sandy Bridge is a new acrh, and so was Nehalem. They both use some elements of Core (just as I'm sure Bulldozer has some similarities to K8), but for the most part they're new architectures. I think you're confused, and I know why from that last line. Intel said that Ivy Bridge would be the last to use the "Core iX" naming scheme. That referred to the branding, not the microarchitectu re.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:28:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16875</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Harry Lloyd says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16861</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What are you talking about? It's the same architecture, with minor and major changes every year. Just like AMD is using K8 since 2004. They're adding new instructions, optimizations, new features, and they move to a new process, but it's still the same architecture (with new codenames - K10, K10.5). Bulldozer is a completely new architecture, designed from the ground up. Ivy Bridge is rumored to be the last Core iteration, and Haswell is supposed to be a completely new architecture, but it's just speculation at this point.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Harry Lloyd</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:40:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21902-high-end-sandy-bridge-e-in-at-least-three-skus#comment-16861</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
