<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>ARM boss cautions Intel</title>
		<description>Discuss ARM boss cautions Intel</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21866-arm-boss-cautions-intel</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:44:04 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21866/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21866-arm-boss-cautions-intel#comment-16600</link>
			<description><![CDATA[and ARM has a long way to go on the desktop]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:32:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21866-arm-boss-cautions-intel#comment-16600</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pogsnet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21866-arm-boss-cautions-intel#comment-16559</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Now they [ARM] are gearing towards low profile x86 level. Nice innovation, lets see how Intel adjust.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pogsnet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:12:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21866-arm-boss-cautions-intel#comment-16559</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Peter Ong says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21866-arm-boss-cautions-intel#comment-16547</link>
			<description><![CDATA[An ARM will finally cost you an arm.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Peter Ong</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:23:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21866-arm-boss-cautions-intel#comment-16547</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
