<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD admits benefiting from Intel's chipset woes</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD admits benefiting from Intel's chipset woes</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:42:55 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21798/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16294</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Okay, I'll bite. Would you mind telling me what I was whining about and what excuses I made? As far as I can tell, you're just here for a little game of devil's advocate, which is why you responded to my comment with something totally irrelevant in the desperate hope of getting me to embarrass myself. That, my friend, is practically the definition of pathetic.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 03:06:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16294</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16275</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm not here to win, but when I see whiners like you making up excuses, and Warrior or Jurassic are nowhere in sight to jump at your throats I just can't help myself.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:18:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16275</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16244</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My god you're an asshole. Screw it, you win. Now go work on your ego so that reading you comments doesn't make people want to punch their monitor.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:03:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16244</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>youserzero says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16243</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sticks and stones may break my bones but ignorant newbs with nothing but an MCSE can never hurt me. You know jack about CPU design, and your level of computer knowledge is highly questionable since you struggle to tell the difference between a server and a laptop.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>youserzero</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:52:55 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16243</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16160</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Oh, you moron, he never did! In fact he stated that businesses might hold off on upgrading to Sandy because of recent issues. It was you that spun the thing to something it isn't. Also, it was my opinion alone that for non-critical parts, such as desktops and laptops, businesses can upgrade to Sandy bridge, and even be safe since not the whole SATA logic was compromised.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:38:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16160</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>youserzero says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16147</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bzzzt wrong. The problem with that, Linux admins don't get fat paychecks. I've been in the field 14 years with 6 different companies...they get about the same. You also forgot to add retraining costs for staff when new Windows versions come out so you haven't the slightest clue what the actual costs would be. You simply fail to see the big picture.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>youserzero</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:00:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16147</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16144</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ugh. It's called sarcasm. Tell me when DazzXP said anything about laptops. Once you do that, then you continue to be an arrogant know-it-all jackass to everyone. Until then, get off your high-horse.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:14:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16144</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yasin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16143</link>
			<description><![CDATA[i don't think you've got it. unless you managed to find an ingenious way to fit a server on to your lap. which i doubt.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yasin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:04:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16143</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16095</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Oh, sorry, my mistake. I though you actually have a relevant point. I see now, you're just frustrated and have nothing better to do. mmmk... That AMD is so far behind might be just your own opinion, not that is has anything to do with reality. Superior performance is a subjective thing. Sure, intel can have superior performance, if they cash in tech through despicable means, rig software and compilers, have a well payed journalistic "staff".]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 07:02:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16095</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16094</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I don't have to be a smartass with a dumbass. Don't embarrass yourself even further! Maybe in your little isolated corner of the world you call your mom's basement you can put an equal sign between lappies with servers, but in the real world, things are different.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 06:51:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21798-amd-admits-benefiting-from-intels-chipset-woes#comment-16094</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
