<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD Phenom X6 1100T and X4 840 tested</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD Phenom X6 1100T and X4 840 tested</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:45:15 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21789/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16076</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wait, why are the tests performed on Windows XP? I can't think of a single logical reason for that...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:05:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16076</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FlOw says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16019</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yeah, those charts are a little hard to comprehend... would something like this be better? http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/4590/benchmarkcharttemp.png I made it with the "benchmark summary" data(top of page 4), so it should have the same info as that chart...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FlOw</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 04:25:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16019</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16014</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Test less cpus. Put names on graphs. Larger grapghs.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:19:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16014</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>D31337Antics says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16011</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Why don't I see atleast the lowest end I7 on here? I kind of wanted to see how it stacked up. :( I have the 1055t in my system and I am still really happy with it but man... can't wait for the bulldozer! :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>D31337Antics</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:45:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16011</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>neo222 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16010</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Seriously Fudo needs to learn ..atleast to use charts in excel..Pathetic Graphs!!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>neo222</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:16:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16010</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Wolf88 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16007</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Crap ! Please change your diagrams design it makes me sick !!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Wolf88</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:54:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16007</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SlickR says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16006</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As always the CPU benchmarks always suck. You can't recognize one cpu from another because there are 20 tested at one time and all have similar color. Don't do these reviews fudzilla, because they suck.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>SlickR</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:23:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16006</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>milkod2001 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16005</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Conclusion: don't be fool and better keep your €199,75,Bulldozer is coming very soon. Those graphs are just awful, why not to put names of CPUs on left instead of that colour scale. It looks very noobish and takes ages to find what color stands for.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>milkod2001</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:17:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21789-amd-phenom-x6-1100t-and-x4-840-tested#comment-16005</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
