<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Ivy Bridge 22nm works with H67 and P67</title>
		<description>Discuss Ivy Bridge 22nm works with H67 and P67</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:32:17 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21765/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>arclight says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-16002</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I will remember and about the overclock, unless you can afford a P67 plus a Core i5 2500K CPU than say goodbye to overclocking. Some people just don't have a budget to afford a 2500k and a good GPU. Now imagine how much $ u can save buying a Phenom II quad core...like i did and was able to buy a GTX 560 instead of a GTX 460 768mb]]></description>
			<dc:creator>arclight</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 17:51:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-16002</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Neo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15932</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I can´t understand why many users not understand the power of Sandy Bridge, WDF. Who cares about buying new platform base on LGA 1366, it´s wasting your money, or letting somebody steals it from you, just think, for much less cash you can build a Sandy Bridge base PC whit a much better OC and power RAW performance than the mayority of the old´s LAG 1366 chips, (i7 960) or i7 975, for exmaple. And this chipset thing,well when the new boards finally hit the market in late april, and Z68 come out, no body is goin to remember that bug, except the Intel heaters.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:48:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15932</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15888</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Um, since when does Intel advertise the number of threads as the number of cores?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 04:20:27 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15888</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>genetix says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15852</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Same goes to these hyper-threaded cores. Understandable to advertise 'hey we got 128 cores where only 64 cores are real and try to make people to see that there is 128 cores while the sad damn fact is those 64 virtual idioticy can maybe take 60% of core performance over any scenario stable, if the physical cores are at 100% and I am here referring to ideal scenario of motherboard. Just asking where the hell are all the REAL hardware to buy ? Why is the 32nm tech costing so much at LGA1366 and not released to LGA1156 in proper 4c manner ? Intel just lost a huge amount of money one would think they wanna sell something instead of just speaking of new crap everytime they have a problem.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>genetix</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:48:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15852</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>genetix says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15851</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Who the hell gives a good damn about 'Ivy Bridge' seriously. Intel in pouring crap after another and should of released update to LGA1366 already which is the only true way to go. We need a decent setups now not tomorrow. Same goes to AMD kick that bulldozer out now and stop the damn blabbering about it. If Intel can't deal with triple channel memory then why are they even trying to build an controller to CPU they lost at 90's to AMD and they still are in quite little shoes comparing to AMD hyper-transport. Understandable that they want to build, but when it doesn't work with their chipset it's an uber failure.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>genetix</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 03:47:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15851</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15821</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nope it is still on schedule and will not be delayed. I read it somewhere but I can't remember where.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 02:39:38 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15821</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15820</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I was just about to build a sandy bridge when they did the recall. I knew there was a reason why I waited lol I plan to upgrade to 22nm cpu if they support higher clock speeds, no more of this adding cores business.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 02:32:13 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15820</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15812</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Intel's never going to live this slip-up down, are they? Seriously, is constantly teasing about a mistake that has a 15% chance of making port fail at some point in the next 3 years really necessary, especially when they're taking full responsibility for it and handling it in the best way customers could ask for? My god, I wonder how you guys would be reacting if it were a more serious issue and Intel denied it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 22:57:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15812</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>milkod2001 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15808</link>
			<description><![CDATA[it's Z68, they should have come with this chipset from the start @ Harry Lloyd: Ivy Bridge will be available q3/q4 11 not later]]></description>
			<dc:creator>milkod2001</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:43:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15808</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdfighter says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15807</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Did they kill off Z68? Seems likely taking into notice the problems they've had with current chipsets. This is a nice move from Intel. After all Ivy is just a shrunk Sandy. But then again Intel is notorious for dropping platforms like they're hot.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdfighter</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:40:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21765-ivy-bridge-22nm-works-with-h67-and-p67#comment-15807</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
