<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Gigabyte has software to test H67/P67 boards for bug</title>
		<description>Discuss Gigabyte has software to test H67/P67 boards for bug</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21762-gigabyte-has-software-to-test-h67/p67-boards-for-bug</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:13:16 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21762/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>FearTec says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21762-gigabyte-has-software-to-test-h67/p67-boards-for-bug#comment-15858</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thw title ("Gigabyte has software to test H67/P67 boards for bug") is a lie, The tool does not check for the bug. it only checks to see if devices are on the SATA2 ports.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FearTec</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 07:48:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21762-gigabyte-has-software-to-test-h67/p67-boards-for-bug#comment-15858</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21762-gigabyte-has-software-to-test-h67/p67-boards-for-bug#comment-15836</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No, not at all, but the big issue here is that chipZILLA, the gaZILLion dollar corp. should at least take some time for proper testing. It's not like they lag behind the competition.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 18:29:28 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21762-gigabyte-has-software-to-test-h67/p67-boards-for-bug#comment-15836</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Squall_Leonhart says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21762-gigabyte-has-software-to-test-h67/p67-boards-for-bug#comment-15834</link>
			<description><![CDATA[and amd are completely innocent >.>]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Squall_Leonhart</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 15:46:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21762-gigabyte-has-software-to-test-h67/p67-boards-for-bug#comment-15834</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>East17 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21762-gigabyte-has-software-to-test-h67/p67-boards-for-bug#comment-15826</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The amount of lack of respect INTEL shows its customers is amazing. What's strange is that INTEL does this very often. Here's how many issues I remember where they've SHIPPED faulty products : 1.FDIV bug 2.Pentium 3 1GHz recalling 3.i820 MCH recall 4.The ICH6 factory layer problem. That was a recall but not to all the products on the market just some i915/i925 maiboards but their goes to prove again that INTEL does NOT quality test their products even 24 hours before packaging 5.PAT enabled chipsets overheating expensive memory from OCZ or Crucial 6. Now these chipsets also shipped without proper testing They've made a habit using their customers as lab rats that do the testing for them .]]></description>
			<dc:creator>East17</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:48:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21762-gigabyte-has-software-to-test-h67/p67-boards-for-bug#comment-15826</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MrScary says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21762-gigabyte-has-software-to-test-h67/p67-boards-for-bug#comment-15801</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wise words, that is gonna be the the app for april fools, the right gift to all noobs buying shity bridges. Get AMD, fool.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MrScary</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:10:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21762-gigabyte-has-software-to-test-h67/p67-boards-for-bug#comment-15801</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jaberwocky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21762-gigabyte-has-software-to-test-h67/p67-boards-for-bug#comment-15779</link>
			<description><![CDATA[They could do with some software that checks and says."your SATA 2 device is connected to a Sandy Bridge motherboard.Dont't be a twat,chuck it away and get an AMD board." :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jaberwocky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:30:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21762-gigabyte-has-software-to-test-h67/p67-boards-for-bug#comment-15779</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21762-gigabyte-has-software-to-test-h67/p67-boards-for-bug#comment-15764</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Maybe this is the SATA Gods telling Intel to move on from 3Gbps and have them run at 6Gbps!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:15:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21762-gigabyte-has-software-to-test-h67/p67-boards-for-bug#comment-15764</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
