<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel hints at Atoms for Gingerbread 2.3</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel hints at Atoms for Gingerbread 2.3</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21686-intel-hints-at-atoms-for-gingerbread-23</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:02:15 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21686/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>yelloweye says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21686-intel-hints-at-atoms-for-gingerbread-23#comment-15377</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the link. Here: is one for you. :)y http://www.fudzilla.com/forum/index.php?topic=947.0]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yelloweye</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 23:07:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21686-intel-hints-at-atoms-for-gingerbread-23#comment-15377</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21686-intel-hints-at-atoms-for-gingerbread-23#comment-15335</link>
			<description><![CDATA[2.3 is Gingerbread and 3.0 is Honeycomb http://developer.android.com/sdk/preview/index.html]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:19:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21686-intel-hints-at-atoms-for-gingerbread-23#comment-15335</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yelloweye says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21686-intel-hints-at-atoms-for-gingerbread-23#comment-15313</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Is Android OS 2.3 called Honeycomb and 3.0 called Gingerbread? http://s1.bild.me/bilder/311010/8305739Snap_2010.12.16_14h34m25s_004.png Source: Slate http://www.fudzilla.com/forum/index.php?topic=923.0]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yelloweye</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:58:24 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21686-intel-hints-at-atoms-for-gingerbread-23#comment-15313</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21686-intel-hints-at-atoms-for-gingerbread-23#comment-15312</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The core is in C so anything that links to that will work, natively... also besides Java there are Ruby and Python.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:13:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21686-intel-hints-at-atoms-for-gingerbread-23#comment-15312</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nubstick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21686-intel-hints-at-atoms-for-gingerbread-23#comment-15302</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Android apps are written in java I thought. As long as they have an x86 jre, and/or if they use a jit compiler like the android official releases there shouldn't be a problem, right?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nubstick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:51:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21686-intel-hints-at-atoms-for-gingerbread-23#comment-15302</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21686-intel-hints-at-atoms-for-gingerbread-23#comment-15282</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sure that you could buy an Atom tablet... the question is do you want to if there are far better alternatives? All apps can be recompiled... rigt now ARM is favored because of the start that smartphones gave them. But Android won't be exclusive to phones... I see a vrey bright future for this OS if Google palys its cards/funds right.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:18:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21686-intel-hints-at-atoms-for-gingerbread-23#comment-15282</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dribble says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21686-intel-hints-at-atoms-for-gingerbread-23#comment-15280</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As all the apps are compiled for ARM what not x86 what will you be able to run on atom gingerbread?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dribble</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:10:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21686-intel-hints-at-atoms-for-gingerbread-23#comment-15280</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
