<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>1GB HD 6950 marginally slower than 2GB model</title>
		<description>Discuss 1GB HD 6950 marginally slower than 2GB model</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:53:52 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21667/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15317</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No way! This is too much fun!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:49:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15317</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Warrior24_7 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15316</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Damn, you didn't even wipe your @$$?!! I bet you didn't wash your hands either. :-x]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Warrior24_7</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:42:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15316</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>majorpayne says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15315</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dont argue with a troll especially that poor thing warrdiot kid, it cannot understand because it has a very small brain or maybe no brain with IQ of 0.000000000000000 000000000000000 0000000001.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>majorpayne</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:30:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15315</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15311</link>
			<description><![CDATA[*returns with new pants* *reads Warrior's comments* *laughs to the point of pissing and crapping pants simultaneously* :sad: *goes to change pants again*]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:54:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15311</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>arclight says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15310</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You clearly haven't red Hilbert's articles for a long time as i did, he was/is such an nvidia fanboy, almost as bad as Charley from SemiAccurate which loves anything related to AMD.... I'm not saying guru3d shows bias in his latest articles but he slips from time to time... My favorite sites for reviews were guru3d and tom's hardware (back when they had Secound take!), now i read more reviews on Tech Report(great site, very professional) and kitguru.net(which is also awesome!). As for breaking news and rumours i always fall back to fudzilla, gotta give them credit ;-) .]]></description>
			<dc:creator>arclight</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:43:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15310</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Warrior24_7 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15309</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Fair or not fair, I didn't do it, so your beef is with MSI, Gigabyte and guru3D. They tested and I posted what was there. The guru is biased? How?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Warrior24_7</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:14:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15309</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Warrior24_7 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15307</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Totally understood. But I can't (and neither can you) take somebody's word for anything did at home. You can pump more juice into the 560 as well! I'm just using what the tech sites are saying. These are their results! Furthermore, where are these beastly OC'd 6950s?!! You're saying its capable of it, so where are they? What company has one? What "link" are you talking about? I just went to guru3D and posted the results from the cards that were tested.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Warrior24_7</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:11:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15307</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15304</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The OC 6950 is just 10MHz more than stock clocks but it can easily achieve 80MHz OC. Why not make 6950 unlocked at 950MHz VS 560 OC to 1GHz? I tell you why. Because ati card wins and you dont want to hear it! :D 6950 unlocked at 950MHz is 28% faster than 810Mhz 6950. Also Warrior you gave no link... Please we want the source.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:58:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15304</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>arclight says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15303</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My point was you compare a 1Ghz Core 560 SOC with a mildly OCed 6950 and pretend it's a fair comparison. Just because AMD partners don't sell highly OCed 6950s doesn't mean the card itself has poor overclocking potential and the GTX 560 Twin Frozr vs 6950 Twin Frozr proves my point. PS: glad to hear you're a guru3d regular as well. I have been visiting that site for a few years now, sometimes their bias drives me nuts but they have great articles.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>arclight</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:54:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15303</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Warrior24_7 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15301</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Then you need to be potty trained, so get yourself a potty chair "sit down" and practice. Don't try and defer the complete ownership of the $h!tty9fiddy! The MSI versions of both cards were benched and the Nvidia version is superior!! Not only that, but there are better, more powerful OC'd 560s to choose from. Those even beat the $h!tty970 2GB on occasion!! This is something I noticed earlier, THE CARDS CAN'T OC! Nobody is willing to "officially" take the cards over 10Mhz! Why?!! EXACTLY!!! :lol: The guru is right on point!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Warrior24_7</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:33:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21667-1gb-hd-6950-marginally-slower-than-2gb-model#comment-15301</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
