<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>16 graphics EUs in Ivy bridge</title>
		<description>Discuss 16 graphics EUs in Ivy bridge</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 21:03:18 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21658/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>voiceofdeath says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15207</link>
			<description><![CDATA[what intel thinking shrink gpu abilities then amd almost ready for Llano deployment]]></description>
			<dc:creator>voiceofdeath</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:17:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15207</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15203</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's a rumor, if Intel gets their silicon interposer to work, big IF. Anyway... intel graphics will still suck for the user that gives a dime about it. For office monkeys that buy based on budget and "limited intel offers", it might not.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:18:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15203</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15116</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Couldn't agree more but what i am hoping for is the more advanced the shaders get then the most complex the jobs they can do. I believe, but not sure, that they have to be programmable to be DX11. So this opens up GPGPU use which is where the useful performance gains are, not increasing from 4fps to 6fps!!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:14:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15116</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15114</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I thought i read that Ivy Bridge will have 1GB of dedicated RAM on-die.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:44:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15114</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>loadwick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15113</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No idea why people are marking you down for pointing out this simple mistake. I guess he might be saying that the performance is non-linearly to the number of EU. As he did mention the fact that the EUs will be clocked much faster too.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>loadwick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:33:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15113</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Harry Lloyd says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15112</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What good are shaders when the amount of ROPs and TMUs will probably remain the same, plus shared RAM. This is ridiculous. Fusion will blow that away, that's what an APU is supposed to look like.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Harry Lloyd</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:28:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15112</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15109</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Why would you care if any integrated graphics does DX11? DX11 applications are exclusively high end and an integrated gpu could never perform in an acceptable way. Those transistors would have been put to better use increasing baseline performance in applications that will be used in real life. Or better yet reduce the total amount of transistors and save some power draw.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:38:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15109</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>braindead says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15101</link>
			<description><![CDATA["just based on more EUs, you can expect at least 25 percent better scores compared to Sandy Bridge" Maybe Fuad should go back to school... 16/12 = 1.333333 => 33.3% better scores it's not THAT hard... of course, that's discounting clock changes and any efficiency changes that adding DX11 ability might cause. PS: The 25% would be correct when reducing from 16 to 12 EUs ;) math's crazy sometimes]]></description>
			<dc:creator>braindead</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:30:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15101</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>smartidiot89 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15100</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The IGP Intel has in Sandy-Bridge isn't THAT bad since the CPU is used alot to do some of the heavy lifting. What Intel needs is better drivers but what is really lacking is having the GPU being programmable for GPGPU-tasks but hey it's Intel so I guess they will keep aiming for x86 and more CPU-cores instead :P]]></description>
			<dc:creator>smartidiot89</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:26:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15100</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>arclight says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15095</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Integrated GPUs will always dissapoint me, yeah i said it!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>arclight</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:54:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21658-16-graphics-eus-in-ivy-bridge#comment-15095</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
