<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>OLPC Arm version is faster than Intel's</title>
		<description>Discuss OLPC Arm version is faster than Intel's</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21568-olpc-arm-version-is-faster-than-intels</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:49:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21568/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>arclight says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21568-olpc-arm-version-is-faster-than-intels#comment-14446</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I was saying what many of us are thinking, a 2W non x86 CPU...big whoopty doo. Please elaborate your conclusion, i'm fascinated by your arguments.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>arclight</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:19:23 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21568-olpc-arm-version-is-faster-than-intels#comment-14446</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cartman says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21568-olpc-arm-version-is-faster-than-intels#comment-14443</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If they really want to help children, maybe they should give them CPU that can work with normal OS...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Cartman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 07:13:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21568-olpc-arm-version-is-faster-than-intels#comment-14443</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>canerpense says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21568-olpc-arm-version-is-faster-than-intels#comment-14428</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You sound like you are a total prick though. This project is paving the way to cheaper netbooks. A netbook doesn't need to be as fast as it's desktop counterparts as it's sole job is to surf the net, do simple daily tasks, write word documents etc. This project's purpose is to give poor people (or countries) adopt today's technological standarts. If you want to play games or a faster pc, you need to pay for it. Long story short, you say that it's not as fast as a Lamborghini, yet they are telling that they produced a cheaper bike which can go faster than the old bike. So this should interest all of us.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>canerpense</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:31:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21568-olpc-arm-version-is-faster-than-intels#comment-14428</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>East17 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21568-olpc-arm-version-is-faster-than-intels#comment-14427</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Oh well .. hopefully Intel's fraud called Atom is gonna die a quick death.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>East17</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:16:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21568-olpc-arm-version-is-faster-than-intels#comment-14427</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jurassic1024 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21568-olpc-arm-version-is-faster-than-intels#comment-14425</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Idiot.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jurassic1024</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:35:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21568-olpc-arm-version-is-faster-than-intels#comment-14425</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>123s says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21568-olpc-arm-version-is-faster-than-intels#comment-14422</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ehm, this is a netbook (from what i got), for internet/office only and 2W sounds pretty awesome, imagine the possible battery life. But true, its obviously not aimed for our marked but still pretty interesting and if it had a decent design (what i doubt) it would interest me too.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>123s</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:02:38 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21568-olpc-arm-version-is-faster-than-intels#comment-14422</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>arclight says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21568-olpc-arm-version-is-faster-than-intels#comment-14411</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This chips hardly hold any interest for us, power users with desktops...sure Intel might claim it has awesome low powered SKUs but we all know they don't. A 2W CPU would give stone age performance for me, i'd rather buy such a system just to smash it with a baseball bat on a ampty field, you know like in the movie... PS: not to sound like a total prick, i understand they want to help out kids in poor countries and as such this product is not aimed at the western market.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>arclight</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:57:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21568-olpc-arm-version-is-faster-than-intels#comment-14411</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
