<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>TI OMAP 4440 1.5GHz in 2H 2011</title>
		<description>Discuss TI OMAP 4440 1.5GHz in 2H 2011</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21546-ti-omap-4440-15ghz-in-2h-2011</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:58:15 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21546/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21546-ti-omap-4440-15ghz-in-2h-2011#comment-14254</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Exodite, you're confusing ARM with RISC... it's true that what you've said, but the main point isn't there. Will ARM be able to do the same workload as x86 in manageable time? Think of it like comparing Brazos, a low-power low-thermal chip with the latest Sandy i5, much hungrier but that much faster as well. (a parallel based on tech specs) ARM's are good for toys, but not serious stuff... I won't condemn anyone for dreaming.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 01:50:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21546-ti-omap-4440-15ghz-in-2h-2011#comment-14254</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>East17 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21546-ti-omap-4440-15ghz-in-2h-2011#comment-14250</link>
			<description><![CDATA[PowerVR will win over nVIDIA's implementation.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>East17</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 01:19:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21546-ti-omap-4440-15ghz-in-2h-2011#comment-14250</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Exodite says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21546-ti-omap-4440-15ghz-in-2h-2011#comment-14166</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ARM have mattered for a long time already, your average PC has more ARM processors inside it than it has x86-capable ones, thanks to the like of I/O and storage micro-controllers. They're simply getting more time in the limelight, due to the mobile revolution, and deservedly so.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Exodite</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:02:50 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21546-ti-omap-4440-15ghz-in-2h-2011#comment-14166</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cartman says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21546-ti-omap-4440-15ghz-in-2h-2011#comment-14161</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Lets talk about that when they will be able to compete in deskton i7 and Phenom 2]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Cartman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:37:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21546-ti-omap-4440-15ghz-in-2h-2011#comment-14161</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jaberwocky says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21546-ti-omap-4440-15ghz-in-2h-2011#comment-14160</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Probably AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL will all soon go the way of the dodo !]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jaberwocky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:29:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21546-ti-omap-4440-15ghz-in-2h-2011#comment-14160</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
