<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Early GTX 560 Ti benches tip up in China</title>
		<description>Discuss Early GTX 560 Ti benches tip up in China</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:50:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21540/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Bobington says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14352</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Completely agree with the "wait for 28nm" advice. I'd also like to see how AMD's new driver team works out, 10.12 has been a disaster for my rig.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bobington</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:04:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14352</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>cantsee19 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14280</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I said that......But who is going to look at two percentages, and try to determine how a video card (in this particular case) is slower, rather than faster? Furthermore, how are you going to logically explain to someone that two products being compared are both "slower" and "faster," but at different ratios? Let's say the 560 is 75% faster, and the 460 is 50% slower on another chart focusing on another card. A 25% difference, right? However, doing division, the 460 would be 33% slower, and the 560 50% faster. Confusing, right? See why most charts focus on the relative difference at 100% (100) from the card under review? In this case, the value would be 25%.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>cantsee19</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:46:43 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14280</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14257</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Actually, no... leftiszi is right. 25% slower from a 100% doesn't equal 25% faster from a 75% quantity. Reverse it! Make 460 100% and 560 will be... ? NOT 125%! more like 130%. Anyway, the 6950 flashed is still the better bet!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 02:20:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14257</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>cantsee19 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14210</link>
			<description><![CDATA[LOL! Also, I didn't give you a thumbs down. Just a heads up. You're cool in my book.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>cantsee19</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:58:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14210</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14208</link>
			<description><![CDATA[so by claiming that your claim is a claim, you have thus proven it to be false even in thine own eyes, so no need in refuting...jk]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:51:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14208</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>cantsee19 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14174</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Not entirely correct, an increase from 75% to 100% is just that, 25%. The only way it would be a 33% increase is if you're trying to gauge the percentage increase from 75 to a 100, which is a quantity. Divide 25 by 75 and you get a 33% percent increase. However, the chart is based on percentages. By dividing 25% by 75% to get 33%, you'd accomplish little; since the accepted difference is still 25%. The chart will always focus on something at 100%. In the case of two percentages, you generally focus on the difference from the higher percentage. This is termed "percentage points" It creates no confusion. http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/64433.html Discuss my "claim". LOL!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>cantsee19</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:26:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14174</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cartman says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14154</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Nerdmaster but 6950 is 6970 in few seconds of work... I usually prefer AMD but i must say that Gtx 460 was in many PCs i build for friends and customers. Usually people try to save asa much as they can with new PC and 460 768 is priced nice, HD 5750 and 5770 costs WAY too much today, and most people wont go over the price of 460 768, i wish 6850 is just a lil more cheaper...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Cartman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:07:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14154</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14130</link>
			<description><![CDATA[:D Are you sure? :-* 560 to be as fast as 6950? We will see when it is launched.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:04:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14130</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>leftiszi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14098</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the news Peter, but I believe what you say regarding that the 560 is 25% faster than the 460 is not entirely correct. According to the graphs, the 560 is 100% and the 460 ~75%. That means that the 460 is 25% slower than the 560 but if you say it the other way around, the 560 is 33% faster. If you come to think of it, that was to be expected with 14% more shaders and 23% more clock. Also, I believe that this 2.1 that appears on the graph, is heaven 2.1. The 560 will be a good card no doubt.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>leftiszi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:26:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14098</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pratkal says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14095</link>
			<description><![CDATA[in the pic HD 6870 3d mark 11 score is not correct i got 4.4k with my 6870]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pratkal</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:11:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21540-early-gtx-560-ti-benches-tip-up-in-china#comment-14095</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
