<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Tegra 2 has yield issues</title>
		<description>Discuss Tegra 2 has yield issues</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21499-tegra-2-has-yield-issues</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 06:54:09 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21499/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21499-tegra-2-has-yield-issues#comment-13771</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Which is the reason why they should have asked Intel for some help.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:57:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21499-tegra-2-has-yield-issues#comment-13771</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jurassic1024 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21499-tegra-2-has-yield-issues#comment-13769</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Huh?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jurassic1024</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:55:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21499-tegra-2-has-yield-issues#comment-13769</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>smartidiot89 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21499-tegra-2-has-yield-issues#comment-13768</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Tegra 2 is an "old" design which finally got some good designwins. I think the problem with Tegra 2 is related to that which was Fermi on the G400-series which was really crap until it meet a refresh where they remade the cores to better suit TSMC's 40nm.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>smartidiot89</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:28:13 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21499-tegra-2-has-yield-issues#comment-13768</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jurassic1024 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21499-tegra-2-has-yield-issues#comment-13756</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If entirely dropping 32nm wasn't enough, it appears the problems of high-k, metal gate and EUV lithography are significant for a company that hasn't used them before. source: bit-tech.com]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jurassic1024</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:30:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21499-tegra-2-has-yield-issues#comment-13756</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jurassic1024 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21499-tegra-2-has-yield-issues#comment-13754</link>
			<description><![CDATA[lol@40nm Tegra 2 not a good idea The article says the yield issues will not affect the schedule... but YOU say Tegra 2 on 40nm is not a good idea? Please please please explain... with a VALID argument.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jurassic1024</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:23:28 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21499-tegra-2-has-yield-issues#comment-13754</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21499-tegra-2-has-yield-issues#comment-13744</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Knowing NVIDIA and there powerful tech department, I am sure they will iron out any possible issues in due time..."BUT" 40nm based Tegra 2 is really not a good idea and for that we can thank TSMC for mucking up the waters and screwing both AMD & NVIDIA out of 32nm... Good Luck NV...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:37:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21499-tegra-2-has-yield-issues#comment-13744</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
