<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nvidia expects record notebook revenue </title>
		<description>Discuss Nvidia expects record notebook revenue </description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21461-nvidia-expects-record-notebook-revenue</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:13:20 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/21461/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>trajan96 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21461-nvidia-expects-record-notebook-revenue#comment-13571</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nvidia is well positioned to finally exploit the great potential of Fermi and Tegra 2. They are a fierce competitor and those who wrote them off were very short sighted.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>trajan96</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 08:28:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21461-nvidia-expects-record-notebook-revenue#comment-13571</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hiro says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21461-nvidia-expects-record-notebook-revenue#comment-13570</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Reality Check: Wasn't the 485M announced just a few days ago? Oh. And from the spec sheets on nVidia's own site, it looks like the GT520M is weaker than the GT420M... and I'm pretty sure that isn't a brand new chip... Anybody wanna confirm this reality check? Thx]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Hiro</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 07:57:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/21461-nvidia-expects-record-notebook-revenue#comment-13570</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
